eCourse art

eCourse

Recent Developments Involving the Conflicting Rights of Mineral Owners and Surface Owners

Contains material from May 2016

Recent Developments Involving the Conflicting Rights of Mineral Owners and Surface Owners
4.18 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?

The written materials were very helpful.

This was a very good analysis of the Anadarko case. I thought it would be more of several different issues concerning mineral v. surface owner. Title was a little misleading.

Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org



Evaluate the Lightning v. Anadarko case and other recent issues and developments dealing with conflicts between mineral owners and surface owners regarding the use of the surface and subsurface.

Includes: Video Audio Paper


Preview mode. You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse, and the eCourse must be active to have full access.
Preview Sessions

Show session details

1. Recent Developments Involving the Conflicting Rights of Mineral Owners and Surface Owners (May 2016)

Lisa Vaughn Lumley, William G. Bredthauer, Dick Watt

0.75 0.00 0.00
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
43 mins
(mp3)
43 mins
(pdf)
129 pgs
Session 1 —43 mins
Recent Developments Involving the Conflicting Rights of Mineral Owners and Surface Owners (May 2016)

Evaluate the Lightning v. Anadarko case and other recent issues and developments dealing with conflicts between mineral owners and surface owners regarding the use of the surface and subsurface.

Originally presented: Apr 2016 Oil, Gas and Mineral Law Institute

Lisa Vaughn Lumley, Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP - Fort Worth, TX
William G. Bredthauer, Harris, Finley & Bogle, P.C. - Fort Worth, TX
Dick Watt, Watt Thompson & Henneman LLP - Houston, TX