eCourse
Opinion Practice after Halo and Stryker—More Valuable Now?
Contains material from Dec 2016
Opinion Practice after Halo and Stryker—More Valuable Now?
4.38 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
Explore the value and usefulness of opinions of counsel in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent Halo and Stryker decisions. Highlights include retracing the recent history of opinions of counsel in patent litigation, identifying various costs and benefits of opinions of counsel, and offering suggestions for when it can be beneficial to obtain an opinions of counsel.
Includes: Video Audio Paper Slides
Preview mode.
You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse,
and the eCourse must be active
to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Show session details
1.
Opinion Practice after Halo and Stryker—More Valuable Now? (Dec 2016)
Jeffrey D. Mills
0.50
0.00
0.00
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1
—29 mins
Opinion Practice after Halo and Stryker—More Valuable Now? (Dec 2016)
Explore the value and usefulness of opinions of counsel in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent Halo and Stryker decisions. Highlights include retracing the recent history of opinions of counsel in patent litigation, identifying various costs and benefits of opinions of counsel, and offering suggestions for when it can be beneficial to obtain an opinions of counsel.
Originally presented: Nov 2016 Advanced Patent Law Institute
Jeffrey D. Mills,
King & Spalding - Austin, TX