eCourse
From Parties to Presidents: The Use of Social Media to Prove Animus
Contains material from Jul 2017
From Parties to Presidents: The Use of Social Media to Prove Animus
4.44 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Truely excellent presentation.
Interesting. Engaging speaker.
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
Explore the use of off-the-job social media statements by decision-makers to demonstrate unlawful animus. Hear an in-depth examination of the legal standards for direct evidence and the stray remark doctrine, along with potential strategies for rehabilitating compromised decision-makers.
Includes: Video Audio Slides
Preview mode.
You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse,
and the eCourse must be active
to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Show session details
1.
From Parties to Presidents: The Use of Social Media to Prove Animus (Jul 2017)
Jason Boulette
0.50
0.25
0.00
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1
—31 mins
From Parties to Presidents: The Use of Social Media to Prove Animus (Jul 2017)
Explore the use of off-the-job social media statements by decision-makers to demonstrate unlawful animus. Hear an in-depth examination of the legal standards for direct evidence and the stray remark doctrine, along with potential strategies for rehabilitating compromised decision-makers.
Originally presented: Jun 2017 Labor and Employment Law Conference
Jason Boulette,
Boulette Golden & Marin L.L.P. - Austin, TX