eCourse art

eCourse

Ethics in Contracting Issues

Contains material from Apr 2018

Ethics in Contracting Issues
4.35 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?

Well done. Very practical.

Great content. Interesting ethical questions.

Could not hear some of the questions from the audience. Maybe have microphones available for audience members to use.

Good information - good examples.

interesting

Could not hear questions. Otherwise, it was a good session

Could not hear audience questions

He is a good and interesting speaker

n/a

Very helpful examples to refine concepts. Enjoyed the presentation.

Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org



Using hypotheticals, this presentation focuses on a number of ethics issues that might arise in contracting situations. Can lawyers take advantage of privileged communications the adversary inadvertently sends them? Can lawyers receiving electronic documents look for hidden metadata the other side has not scrubbed? What duties do lawyers have in representing contracting parties, with regards to disclosing client confidences to prevent the adversary from being deceived about the clients' intent, or to correct the adversary's misunderstanding about the law, the contract's terms, or the adversary's scriveners error?

Includes: Video Audio Paper


Preview mode. You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse, and the eCourse must be active to have full access.
Preview Sessions

Show session details

1. Ethics in Contracting Issues (Apr 2018)

Tom Spahn

1.00 1.00 0.00
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
58 mins
(mp3)
58 mins
Paper
(pdf)
7 pgs
(pdf)
54 pgs
Session 1 —58 mins
Ethics in Contracting Issues (Apr 2018)

Using hypotheticals, this presentation focuses on a number of ethics issues that might arise in contracting situations. Can lawyers take advantage of privileged communications the adversary inadvertently sends them? Can lawyers receiving electronic documents look for hidden metadata the other side has not scrubbed? What duties do lawyers have in representing contracting parties, with regards to disclosing client confidences to prevent the adversary from being deceived about the clients' intent, or to correct the adversary's misunderstanding about the law, the contract's terms, or the adversary's scriveners error?

Originally presented: Apr 2018 Health Law Conference

Tom Spahn, McGuireWoods LLP - Tysons, VA