eCourse
Standards of Review and Judicial Deference in Administrative Law
Contains material from Sep 2018
Standards of Review and Judicial Deference in Administrative Law
3.92 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
good
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
Session : Disentangling the Standards of Review - The APA authorizes judicial review of contested-case decisions under the “substantial evidence rule,” but the various standards of review (de novo, substantial evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and abuse of discretion) are frequently confused and conflated. Learn to disentangle those standards with a framework for identifying, defining, and effectively applying the correct standard to uphold or challenge agency decisions.
Session 2: Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretation of Statutes In Texas - Listen to a discussion about in what circumstances and to what extent Texas courts defer to state agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Contrast and compare Texas deference to that given by federal courts to federal agency interpretations.
Session 2: Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretation of Statutes In Texas - Listen to a discussion about in what circumstances and to what extent Texas courts defer to state agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Contrast and compare Texas deference to that given by federal courts to federal agency interpretations.
Includes: Video Audio Paper Slides
Preview mode.
You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse,
and the eCourse must be active
to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Show session details
1.
Disentangling the Standards of Review (Sep 2018)
Susan A. Kidwell
0.75
0.00
0.00
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1
—43 mins
Disentangling the Standards of Review (Sep 2018)
The APA authorizes judicial review of contested-case decisions under the “substantial evidence rule,” but the various standards of review (de novo, substantial evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and abuse of discretion) are frequently confused and conflated. Learn to disentangle those standards with a framework for identifying, defining, and effectively applying the correct standard to uphold or challenge agency decisions.
Originally presented: Aug 2018 Advanced Texas Administrative Law Seminar
Susan A. Kidwell,
Locke Lord LLP - Austin, TX
Show session details
2.
Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretation of Statutes In Texas (Sep 2018)
Hon. Thomas R. Phillips
0.50
0.00
0.00
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 2
—28 mins
Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretation of Statutes In Texas (Sep 2018)
Discuss in what circumstances and to what extent Texas courts defer to state agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Contrast and compare Texas deference to that given by federal courts to federal agency interpretations.
Originally presented: Aug 2018 Advanced Texas Administrative Law Seminar
Hon. Thomas R. Phillips,
Baker Botts L.L.P. - Austin, TX