eCourse art

eCourse

eSupplement to the 2019 Conference on Criminal Appeals

Contains material from Dec 2017 to Dec 2018

eSupplement to the 2019 Conference on Criminal Appeals
4 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?

Interesting and informative.

Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org



Session 1: Greed...for Lack of a Better Word...is[n't] Good - Using a series of case studies, explore the ethical obligations and fiduciary duties owed by lawyers to clients and how the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure are implicated in each.

Session 2: ​Deep Ethics: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Internet The work tools in the modern law office now consist of a networked ecosystem of distractions, and our default method of use may be harmful to us and degrade the value we can bring to clients. Change the way you use these tools to preserve wellness and protect your ability to engage in deep, linear, creative thinking.

Session 3: Dealing with Bad Facts Every case has bad facts, some to a greater degree. The opponent always has points to make. Filing for a motion in limine is the first line of defense, but if that fails or there is no legitimate argument to exclude the bad evidence, what do you do? Investigate whether it is best to deal with bad facts only after the opponent introduces them, or if it is better to “inoculate” the jury against negative effects by introducing them first in a weakened form.

Includes: Video Audio Paper Slides


Preview mode. You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse, and the eCourse must be active to have full access.
Preview Sessions

Show session details

1. Greed...for Lack of a Better Word...is[n't] Good (Dec 2018)

F. Daniel Knight

1.00 1.00 0.00
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
57 mins
Paper
(pdf)
10 pgs
Slides
(pdf)
2 pgs
Session 1 —57 mins
Greed...for Lack of a Better Word...is[n't] Good (Dec 2018)

Using a series of case studies, explore the ethical obligations and fiduciary duties owed by lawyers to clients and how the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure are implicated in each.

Originally presented: Dec 2018 Greed...for Lack of a Better Word...is[n't] Good

F. Daniel Knight, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry - Houston, TX

Show session details

2. ​Deep Ethics: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Internet (Jul 2018)

Kendall M. Gray

0.50 0.50 0.00
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
29 mins
(mp3)
29 mins
(pdf)
34 pgs
Session 2 —29 mins
​Deep Ethics: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Internet (Jul 2018)

The work tools in the modern law office now consist of a networked ecosystem of distractions, and our default method of use may be harmful to us and degrade the value we can bring to clients. Change the way you use these tools to preserve wellness and protect your ability to engage in deep, linear, creative thinking.

Originally presented: Jun 2018 Conference on State and Federal Appeals

Kendall M. Gray, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP - Houston, TX

Show session details

3. Dealing with Bad Facts (Dec 2017)

Quentin Brogdon

0.75 0.00 0.00
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
44 mins
(mp3)
44 mins
(pdf)
21 pgs
(pdf)
26 pgs
Session 3 —44 mins
Dealing with Bad Facts (Dec 2017)

Every case has bad facts, some to a greater degree. The opponent always has points to make. Filing for a motion in limine is the first line of defense, but if that fails or there is no legitimate argument to exclude the bad evidence, what do you do? Investigate whether it is best to deal with bad facts only after the opponent introduces them, or if it is better to “inoculate” the jury against negative effects by introducing them first in a weakened form.

Originally presented: Nov 2017 Civil Litigation Conference

Quentin Brogdon, Crain Lewis Brogdon, LLP - Dallas, TX