eConference
2025 David W. Robertson Admiralty and Maritime Law eConference (audio only)
Contains material from Feb 2025
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
- System Test
-
$495 Add to Cart
Includes: Audio Paper Slides No Materials
- Total Credit Hours:
- 7.25 | 1.50 ethics
- Credit Info
- TX, CA, PA
- Specialization: Administrative Law | Civil Appellate Law | Civil Trial Law | Oil, Gas and Mineral Law | Personal Injury Trial Law
- TX MCLE credit expires: 1/31/2026
Preview Sessions
Show session details
Matthew H. Ammerman, Michael F. Sturley
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1 —80 mins 1.25
Recent Developments in Admiralty and Maritime Law at the National Level and in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits (Feb 2025)
The twenty-fourth annual installment of the seminal paper surveys developments, identifies issues of genuine national importance, and discusses items of significant interest from the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Matthew H. Ammerman,
Law Office of Matthew H. Ammerman, P.C. - Houston, TX
Michael F. Sturley,
The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX
Show session details
Carrol P. Hand, David Hornbeak, Roger Levy
Download session materials for offline use
Session 2 —57 mins 1.00
Knowing the Ropes: Maritime Practice in a Post-Chevron World (Feb 2025)
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and the overturning of Chevron Deference, the maritime industry is facing a sea of change. From presenting cases under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), to challenging agency actions under OPA, CERCLA, and the Jones Act, to challenging Federal Maritime Commission and other agency promulgated regulations, the absence of Chevron Deference is already having a strong and lasting impact. The speakers discuss broad practice trends, individual case studies, and what the maritime industry looks like in a post-Chevron world.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Carrol P. Hand,
Holland & Knight LLP - Richmond, VA
David Hornbeak,
Holland & Knight LLP - Houston, TX
Roger Levy,
Levy Mediations - Tiburon, CA
Show session details
Felisa E. Sanchez, Jody M. Schisel-Meslin
Session 3 —27 mins 0.50
Salty, Silent, but Not Surreptitious: Update on Maritime Liens (Feb 2025)
This presentation compares and contrasts maritime liens from a global perspective with a focus on U.S. and U.K. law liens. It addresses the practical impact of these differences in the creation, priority, and enforcement of these maritime liens in U.S. courts.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Felisa E. Sanchez,
K&L Gates LLP - Houston, TX
Jody M. Schisel-Meslin,
K&L Gates LLP - Houston, TX
Show session details
Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal
Download session materials for offline use
Session 4 —30 mins 0.50
The More Things Change… 30 Years of Judging Admiralty Cases (Feb 2025)
Learn how the admiralty docket in the Southern District of Texas has changed over the last 30 years, and what that can teach us about what to expect in the next 30 years.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal,
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas - Houston, TX
Show session details
Harold K. Watson
Download session materials for offline use
Session 5 —26 mins 0.50
Robins Dry Dock and Intentional Torts (Feb 2025)
A review of attempts by plaintiffs to circumvent the rule of Robins Dry v. Flint that precludes recovery of economic damages in the absence of a proprietary interest in damaged property by alleging an intentional tort.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Harold K. Watson,
Chaffe McCall LLP - Houston, TX
Show session details
F. Daniel Knight, Mark T. Murray, Andrew Schreck
Session 6 —56 mins 1.00
To Save, or Not to Save: Perspectives on Admiralty Suits in State Courts under the Saving to Suitors Clause of 28 U.S.C. 1333 (Feb 2025)
Hear from two accomplished attorneys on different sides of the bar concerning the positives and negatives of admiralty suits filed in state court.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
F. Daniel Knight,
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry - Houston, TX
Mark T. Murray,
Stevenson & Murray - Houston, TX
Andrew Schreck,
Schouest, Bamdas, Soshea, BenMaier & Eastham PLLC - Houston, TX
Show session details
Bradley A. Jackson, Scott Rothenberg
Download session materials for offline use
Session 7 —60 mins 1.00 | 1.00 ethics
What to Do if Your Client is Misbehaving (Part XIV) (Feb 2025)
Real-world questions and answers regarding ethics, the law, and what to do when your client asks you to do something improper. Stump our experts with your hardest questions! Please submit your questions in advance to ConferenceQA@utcle.org.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Bradley A. Jackson,
The University of Texas School of Law - Houston, TX
Scott Rothenberg,
Law Offices of Scott Rothenberg - Bellaire, TX
Show session details
Julia M. Haines, Katia Leiva
Session 8 —24 mins 0.50 | 0.50 ethics
Why Does a Law Firm Need a Legal Department? (Feb 2025)
An exploration of how a firm’s legal department can work to protect the firm and help lawyers navigate ethical questions, engagement letters, conflicts, waivers, sanctions, unhappy clients, claims, grievances, the use of AI and more.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Julia M. Haines,
Holland & Knight LLP - Houston, TX
Katia Leiva,
Holland & Knight LLP - Houston, TX
Show session details
Alan M. Weigel
Download session materials for offline use
Session 9 —32 mins 0.50
Choice-of-Law Issues and Proof of Foreign Law in Collision Cases (Feb 2025)
This presentation examines how courts analyze the choice of law factors of Lauritzen v. Larsen and its progeny in a vessel collision case, and the materials courts consider in determining foreign law, using as its example the litigation resulting from the collision of a United States warship in the Singapore Strait.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Alan M. Weigel,
Blank Rome LLP - New York, NY
Show session details
Michael F. Sturley
Session 10 —28 mins 0.50
The Potential-to-Disrupt Maritime Commerce Test for Admiralty Tort Jurisdiction (Feb 2025)
A federal court exercising admiralty tort jurisdiction must find that the relevant “incident has a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce.” But the Supreme Court has offered little guidance on the contours of the potential-to-disrupt-maritime-commerce test, and lower-court decisions are hopelessly inconsistent. This presentation provides an overview and a critical analysis of the issue.
Originally presented: Jan 2025 Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference
Michael F. Sturley,
The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX