University of Texas School of Law
20th Annual
Advanced Patent Law Institute
Austin Nov 5-6, 2015 Four Seasons Hotel
Conference Concluded
Live Webcast Nov 5-6, 2015
Conference Concluded
Related products: eConferences, Materials
PREMIER SPONSOR
IPFC Corp.

LUNCHEON PRESENTATION SPONSORS
Baker Botts 
McKool Smith 

SPONSORS 
BDO USA, LLP
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
Charles River Associates
DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P.
Duff and Phelps
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Haynes and Boone, LLP 
Jackson Walker LLP
Jones Day 
Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright 
Ocean Tomo, LLC
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Thompson & Knight LLP
Vinson & Elkins LLP
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
 

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Program Features
UT Law's Advanced Patent Law Institute in Austin brings together nationally-recognized leaders in the patent law practice—practitioners, in-house counsel, academics, senior USPTO officials and members of the judiciary—to cover the latest developments and impacts of key cases in patent law.

The Institute features a sophisticated array of presentations and discussions on prosecution and litigation topics, including:
  • Recent developments and trends in claims construction, including the impact of Teva v. Sandoz and Williamson v. Citrix Online
  • An update on AIA trial practice and rules at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by Judge Miriam L. Quinn
  • An in-depth look at current PTAB procedural practice, trial strategy, and the interplay with district court litigation
  • A discussion on optimizing the synergy between in-house counsel and outside counsel
  • An examination of the changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with Judge Lee H. Rosenthal and Judge Xavier Rodriguez
  • Recent decisions, prosecution issues and litigation impacts around patentable subject matter for software and business methods
  • Keynote Presentation by Russell Slifer, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the U.S. Patent Trademark Office
  • A closer look at improving patent prosecution efficiency and increasing the effective term limit
  • Presentations by nationally-recognized academics—Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School; John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law; and David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law
  • A review of inequitable conduct cases since Therasense and the recent trend of attorney sanctions
  • Insight from sitting U.S. District Court Judges, including Judge Robert W. Schroeder III (EDTX) and Judge Paul Singh Grewal (NDCA) on the current landscape for damages and remedies and their experiences hearing patent cases

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

11/12/19
Schedule

Thursday Morning

Presiding Officer:
William L. LaFuze, McKool Smith - Houston, TX

7:30 am

Austin Only

Registration Opens

Includes continental breakfast.

8:20 am
Welcoming Remarks

8:30 am

0.75 hr

Recent Developments in Claims Construction

Claim construction remains pivotal for patent preparation/prosecution, trials, appeals, and AIA post grant review proceedings. Review Teva v. Sandoz, Williamson v. Citrix Online and consider new trends that they and their descendants have generated as they are being applied.

Kenneth R. Adamo, Kirkland & Ellis LLP - Chicago, IL

9:15 am

0.75 hr

Definiteness and Induced Infringement

A discussion of the historical development and current state of the law of definiteness and induced infringement; plus a look at current issues and trends as seen from the trenches of the district courts after Nautilus, Akamai and Commil, and how they might impact your practice.

Kevin Kudlac, Greenberg Traurig, LLP - Austin, TX
Rene A. Trevino, Greenberg Traurig, LLP - Houston, TX

10:00 am
Break

10:15 am

1.00 hr

Patentable Subject Matter for Software and Business Methods

A review of Federal Circuit decisions, as well as the District Courts’ responses to those decisions, and thoughts on strategies gleaned from those cases; plus commentary on the claims and specifications of selected court decisions and thoughts on drafting new applications and responding to office actions.

Max Ciccarelli, Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas, TX
David P. Swenson, Farney Daniels PC - Minneapolis, MN
Keith Lutsch, Blank Rome LLP - Houston, TX

11:15 am

0.50 hr

Current Issues in Life Sciences

An update on key legal issues impacting the life sciences industry.

Ana C. Ward, Award Ventures, LLC - Austin, TX

11:45 am

Austin Only

Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)

 Included in registration.

Thursday Afternoon

Presiding Officer:
Robert L. King, Silicon Labs - Austin, TX

LUNCHEON PRESENTATION

Thank You to Our Exclusive Sponsor

Baker Botts L.L.P.

12:05 pm

0.50 hr

USPTO Today

Russell Slifer, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

 
12:35 pm
Break

12:50 pm

0.75 hr

Efficient Patent Prosecution to Increase Effective Term Length

An analysis of how the choice of filing location, filing order, and priority claims can affect the total patent term and patent prosecution length, and how the options for improving efficiency including the use of interviewing in the U.S. (under the First Action Interview Pilot Program and the After Final Consideration Program) can increase the effective term length in the U.S. and abroad.

Michael W. Piper, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX
Andrew Metrailer, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX

1:35 pm

0.75 hr

Optimizing Synergy Between In-House and Outside Counsel

In-house counsel play a vital role in matching the needs and expectations of their client with the support provided by outside counsel. Hear strategies on optimizing synergy in patent litigation by closing the working relationship gap between these different legal roles.

Moderator:
Hilda C. Galvan, Jones Day - Dallas, TX
Panelists:
Robert L. King, Silicon Labs - Austin, TX
Marta Y. Beckwith, Aruba Networks, Inc. - Sunnyvale, CA

2:20 pm

0.75 hr

Licensing and Joint Defense Agreements

Joint defense agreements and patent licenses/settlement agreements arise in almost all complex patent cases. Examine the key issues litigators need to consider when drafting, negotiating and advising clients about these critical contracts. 

Edward A. Cavazos, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Austin, TX

3:05 pm
Break

3:15 pm

0.75 hr

Damages

A discussion of the current damages landscape, including royalty stacking, FRAND terms, as well as the impact of recent decisions providing guidance on acceptable patent damages methodology.

David J. Healey, Fish & Richardson P.C. - Houston, TX

4:00 pm

1.00 hr
0.50 hr ethics

Judicial Panel

Distinguished judges from the District Court discuss their experiences hearing and trying patent cases.

Moderator:
Hon. David J. Folsom, Jackson Walker L.L.P. - Texarkana, TX
Panelists:
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California - San Jose, CA
Hon. John D. Love, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Tyler, TX
Hon. Robert L. Pitman, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - San Antonio and Austin, TX
Hon. Robert W. Schroeder III, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Texarkana, TX

5:00 pm
Adjourn

Friday Morning

Presiding Officer:
Michael P. Adams, Jackson Walker L.L.P. - Austin, TX

7:30 am

Austin Only

Conference Room Opens

Includes continental breakfast.

8:30 am

0.75 hr ethics

Ethics before the USPTO

An examination of the less obvious ways that inefficient or incompetent prosecution can harm clients, and a look at recent conflicts of interest cases in patent and trademark practice.

David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP - Macon and Atlanta, GA

9:15 am

0.75 hr

Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure aim to expedite proceedings, promote greater judicial involvement in case management, address proportionality in discovery, and alter the sanctions analysis.  Explore these changes and hear tips for navigating them. 

Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas - Houston, TX
Hon. Xavier Rodriguez, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - San Antonio, TX

10:00 am
Break

Tactical Considerations at the PTAB

10:15 am

0.50 hr

PTAB Update

An update on AIA trial practice and rules at the PTAB.  

Hon. Miriam L. Quinn, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board - Dallas, TX

10:45 am

0.50 hr

PTAB Procedural Developments

An analysis of the procedural aspects of PTAB practice, directed to recent developments and their impact on overall case strategy—including stay of District Court litigation, redundancy rulings and how to avoid them, and new rules and proposed legislation.

Moderator:
David L. McCombs, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Dallas, TX
Panelists:
Kyle E. Friesen, Mayer Brown LLP - Houston, TX
Daniel S. Block, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
Theodore M. Foster, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Richardson, TX

11:15 am

1.00 hr

PTAB Trial Strategy

A discussion of PTAB trials and experience from real cases on what works most effectively, mistakes to avoid, and the interplay with District court litigation—including real party in interest and privy considerations, the present and future of amendment practice, litigation coordination and how to deal with conflicting decisions, and corrected filings and tactics.

Moderator:
David L. McCombs, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Dallas, TX
Panelists:
Sharon A. Israel, Mayer Brown LLP - Houston, TX
Robert Greene Sterne, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
Christopher J. Lewis, FLIR Systems, Inc. - Wilsonville, OR

 
12:15 pm

Austin Only

Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)

Included in registration.

Friday Afternoon

Presiding Officer:
James D. Woods, BDO USA, LLP - Houston, TX

LUNCHEON PRESENTATION

Thank You to Our Exclusive Sponsor

McKool Smith

12:35 pm

0.75 hr

Supreme Court Update

The Supreme Court continues to intervene regularly in patent matters. Review the recent decisions and patterns in both the Court’s and individual Justices’ approaches.

John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX

 
1:20 pm
Break

1:35 pm

0.75 hr

Federal Circuit Year in Review

An overview of the year in patent decisions.

Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP - Stanford and San Francisco, CA

2:20 pm

0.50 hr

U.S. Patent Reform:  Where Are We Now?

The activity in Congress involving patent reform is constantly evolving.  Hear more on Congress' current positions, as well as State legislation directed to bad faith patent assertions.

Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea, Crowell & Moring, LLP - Washington, DC

2:50 pm

0.50 hr ethics

Attorney Beware! Client’s Inequitable Conduct Can Lead to Attorney Liability

A review of inequitable conduct cases since Therasense, a look at the recent trend of attorney sanctions for representing clients that commit inequitable conduct, plus tips and considerations for avoiding attorney liability.

Darryl J. Adams, Baker Botts - Austin, TX
Tecuan Flores, Baker Botts - Austin, TX

3:20 pm

0.75 hr ethics

Ethics in Negotiation: The True Cost of Representation

When a client discloses a terrible truth or reveals an unspeakable purpose, what obligations do the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Conduct place on an attorney? What happens when it’s time for an attorney to move on? Explore the unexpected answers given by the Rules using both recent and historical real world cases. 

Michael J. Golden, Boulette Golden & Marin L.L.P. - Austin, TX

4:05 pm
Adjourn

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Faculty

Conference Faculty

Kenneth R. Adamo
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Chicago, IL
Darryl J. Adams
Baker Botts
Austin, TX
Marta Y. Beckwith
Aruba Networks, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Daniel S. Block
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC
Edward A. Cavazos
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Austin, TX
Max Ciccarelli
Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX
Tecuan Flores
Baker Botts
Austin, TX
Hon. David J. Folsom
Jackson Walker L.L.P.
Texarkana, TX
Theodore M. Foster
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Richardson, TX
Kyle E. Friesen
Mayer Brown LLP
Houston, TX
Hilda C. Galvan
Jones Day
Dallas, TX
John M. Golden
The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX
Michael J. Golden
Boulette Golden & Marin L.L.P.
Austin, TX
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
San Jose, CA
David J. Healey
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX
David Hricik
Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP
Macon and Atlanta, GA
Sharon A. Israel
Mayer Brown LLP
Houston, TX
Robert L. King
Silicon Labs
Austin, TX
Kevin Kudlac
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Austin, TX
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA
Christopher J. Lewis
FLIR Systems, Inc.
Wilsonville, OR
Hon. John D. Love
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Tyler, TX
Keith Lutsch
Blank Rome LLP
Houston, TX
David L. McCombs
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX
Andrew Metrailer
Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX
Michael W. Piper
Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX
Hon. Robert L. Pitman
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
San Antonio and Austin, TX
Hon. Miriam L. Quinn
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Dallas, TX
Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea
Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC
Hon. Xavier Rodriguez
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
San Antonio, TX
Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
Houston, TX
Hon. Robert W. Schroeder III
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Texarkana, TX
Russell Slifer
Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA
Robert Greene Sterne
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC
David P. Swenson
Farney Daniels PC
Minneapolis, MN
Rene A. Trevino
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Houston, TX
Ana C. Ward
Award Ventures, LLC
Austin, TX

Planning Committee

Robert L. King—Co-Chair
Silicon Labs
Austin, TX
Kevin J. Meek—Co-Chair
Baker Botts
Austin, TX
Michael P. Adams
Jackson Walker L.L.P.
Austin, TX
Tom Adolph
Adolph Locklar
Houston, TX
Alan D. Albright
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
Austin, TX
Michael C. Barrett
Cirrus Logic
Austin, TX
Brent K. Bersin
Duff and Phelps
Houston, TX
Jane Politz Brandt
Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX
Christa Brown-Sanford
Baker Botts
Dallas, TX
Bryan Farney
Farney Daniels PC
Georgetown, TX
John D. Flynn
IBM Corporation
Austin, TX
Hilda C. Galvan
Jones Day
Dallas, TX
John Garvish
McKool Smith
Austin, TX
Jonathan N. Geld
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Austin, TX
John M. Golden
The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX
David J. Healey
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX
Joanna Jefferson
The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX
Kevin Kudlac
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Austin, TX
William L. LaFuze
McKool Smith
Houston, TX
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA
David L. McCombs
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX
Eric L. Natinsky
Quick Technologies Inc.
Austin, TX
Floyd R. Nation
Law Offices of Floyd R. Nation
San Antonio, TX
James J. Nawrocki
IPFC Corp.
Houston, TX
David W. O'Brien
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX
Mark E. Patrick
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Dallas, TX
Louis A. Riley
McAfee, Inc.
Plano, TX
Jennie Salazar
The JLSalazar Law Firm, PLLC
Houston, TX
Mark E. Scott
Conley Rose, PC
Austin, TX
José C. Villarreal
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
West Lake Hills, TX
Ana C. Ward
Award Ventures, LLC
Austin, TX
Shirley Webster
Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX
William D. Wiese
DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P.
Austin, TX
Keith E. Witek
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Austin, TX
James D. Woods
BDO USA, LLP
Houston, TX

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Credit Information

MCLE Credit

Texas
14.25 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
A Texas MCLE Reporting Form will be included in your course materials. Please complete and return to the registration desk and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas, or you can self-report your credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com. A Certificate of Attendance will be provided at the conference to keep for your records.  
California
14.25 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Illinois
13.75 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference. Self report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
New Jersey
15.00 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found at Regulation 2.01:4.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
New York
15.00 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider (#1944), and the State Bar of California is a New York Approved Jurisdiction, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the New York State Bar Association. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Ohio
12.25 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to The Supreme Court of Ohio within 30 days after the conference. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records.
Oklahoma
17.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the conference.
Pennsylvania
9.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive the Pennsylvania CLE Board Credit Request Form and approval documentation to self-report credit directly to the Pennsylvania CLE Board. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Other States
Note on Self-Reporting Your Credits in Another State
If you wish to satisfy MCLE or other professional education requirements in another state for a program offered by the University of Texas School of Law, please check with the state bar or other licensing authority in that state before taking the program to ensure it will qualify for self-reporting your credits.

Other Credit

TX Accounting CPE
17.00 hrs
Additional Information
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live conferences are presumptively approved by The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Accounting CPE Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Texas Accounting Certificate of Completion at the conference for your records. Self-report your CPE credit directly to TSBPA. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

MCLE Credit

Texas
14.25 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
UT Law CLE will report credit to the State Bar of Texas on your behalf. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com. A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit.
California
14.25 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
Self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov. Print and keep the Certificate of Completion for your records. A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit.
Illinois – Expected
14.25 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
New Jersey – Expected
15.00 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found at Regulation 2.01:4.

New Jersey MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim New York MCLE credit, New Jersey credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on CLE.
New York
15.00 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider (#1944), and the State Bar of California is a New York Approved Jurisdiction, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines.

New York MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim New York MCLE credit, New York credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the New York State CLE Board.
Ohio
12.25 hrs  |  2.00 hrs Ethics
Oklahoma
17.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
Additional Information
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #169) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Oklahoma Bar Association for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Oklahoma MCLE credit, Oklahoma credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the webcast.

Other Credit

TX Accounting CPE
17.00 hrs
Additional Information
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Texas Accounting CPE credit, the Texas Accounting CPE credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your CPE credit directly to the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Key Dates

Austin

  • Last day for Individual early registration: Oct 30, 2015
    Add $50 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for Group (5-9 ppl) early registration: Oct 30, 2015
    Add $50 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for Group (10 or more ppl) early registration: Oct 30, 2015
    Add $50 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 30, 2015
  • Last day for cancellation (partial refund): Nov 2, 2015
    $50 processing fee applied

Live Webcast

  • Last day for Individual early registration: Nov 6, 2015
    Add $0 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for Group (5-9 ppl) early registration: Nov 6, 2015
    Add $0 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for Group (10 or more ppl) early registration: Nov 6, 2015
    Add $0 for registrations received after this time
  • Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 30, 2015
  • Last day for cancellation (partial refund): Nov 2, 2015
    $50 processing fee applied

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Hotel / Venue

UT Law CLE

2015 Advanced Patent Law Institute

Sponsors