About

UT Law's Advanced Patent Law Institute in Austin brings together nationally-recognized leaders in the patent law practice—practitioners, in-house counsel, academics, senior USPTO officials and members of the judiciary—to cover the latest developments and impacts of key cases in patent law.

The Institute features a sophisticated array of presentations and discussions on prosecution and litigation topics, including:
  • Recent developments and trends in claims construction, including the impact of Teva v. Sandoz and Williamson v. Citrix Online
  • An update on AIA trial practice and rules at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by Judge Miriam L. Quinn
  • An in-depth look at current PTAB procedural practice, trial strategy, and the interplay with district court litigation
  • A discussion on optimizing the synergy between in-house counsel and outside counsel
  • An examination of the changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with Judge Lee H. Rosenthal and Judge Xavier Rodriguez
  • Recent decisions, prosecution issues and litigation impacts around patentable subject matter for software and business methods
  • Keynote Presentation by Russell Slifer, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the U.S. Patent Trademark Office
  • A closer look at improving patent prosecution efficiency and increasing the effective term limit
  • Presentations by nationally-recognized academics—Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School; John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law; and David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law
  • A review of inequitable conduct cases since Therasense and the recent trend of attorney sanctions
  • Insight from sitting U.S. District Court Judges, including Judge Robert W. Schroeder III (EDTX) and Judge Paul Singh Grewal (NDCA) on the current landscape for damages and remedies and their experiences hearing patent cases

Event Schedule

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Thursday Morning
    Presiding Officer:
    William L. LaFuze, McKool Smith - Houston, TX
  • 7:30 am
    Austin Only
    Registration Opens

    Includes continental breakfast.
  • 8:20 am
    Welcoming Remarks

  • 8:30 am
    0.75 hr
    Recent Developments in Claims Construction

    Kenneth R. Adamo, Kirkland & Ellis LLP - Chicago, IL

    Claim construction remains pivotal for patent preparation/prosecution, trials, appeals, and AIA post grant review proceedings. Review Teva v. Sandoz, Williamson v. Citrix Online and consider new trends that they and their descendants have generated as they are being applied.
  • 9:15 am
    0.75 hr
    Definiteness and Induced Infringement

    Kevin Kudlac, Greenberg Traurig, LLP - Austin, TX
    Rene A. Trevino, Greenberg Traurig, LLP - Houston, TX

    A discussion of the historical development and current state of the law of definiteness and induced infringement; plus a look at current issues and trends as seen from the trenches of the district courts after Nautilus, Akamai and Commil, and how they might impact your practice.
  • 10:00 am
    Break

  • 10:15 am
    1.00 hr
    Patentable Subject Matter for Software and Business Methods

    Max Ciccarelli, Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas, TX
    David P. Swenson, Farney Daniels PC - Minneapolis, MN
    Keith Lutsch, Blank Rome LLP - Houston, TX

    A review of Federal Circuit decisions, as well as the District Courts’ responses to those decisions, and thoughts on strategies gleaned from those cases; plus commentary on the claims and specifications of selected court decisions and thoughts on drafting new applications and responding to office actions.
  • 11:15 am
    0.50 hr
    Current Issues in Life Sciences

    Ana C. Ward, Award Ventures, LLC - Austin, TX

    An update on key legal issues impacting the life sciences industry.
  • 11:45 am
    Austin Only
    Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)

     Included in registration.
  • Thursday Afternoon
    Presiding Officer:
    Robert L. King, Silicon Labs - Austin, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • Thank You to Our Exclusive Sponsor

    Baker Botts L.L.P.
  • 12:05 pm
    0.50 hr
    USPTO Today

    Russell Slifer, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 12:35 pm
    Break

  • 12:50 pm
    0.75 hr
    Efficient Patent Prosecution to Increase Effective Term Length

    Michael W. Piper, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX
    Andrew Metrailer, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX

    An analysis of how the choice of filing location, filing order, and priority claims can affect the total patent term and patent prosecution length, and how the options for improving efficiency including the use of interviewing in the U.S. (under the First Action Interview Pilot Program and the After Final Consideration Program) can increase the effective term length in the U.S. and abroad.
  • 1:35 pm
    0.75 hr
    Optimizing Synergy Between In-House and Outside Counsel

    Moderator:
    Hilda C. Galvan, Jones Day - Dallas, TX
    Panelists:
    Robert L. King, Silicon Labs - Austin, TX
    Marta Y. Beckwith, Aruba Networks, Inc. - Sunnyvale, CA

    In-house counsel play a vital role in matching the needs and expectations of their client with the support provided by outside counsel. Hear strategies on optimizing synergy in patent litigation by closing the working relationship gap between these different legal roles.
  • 2:20 pm
    0.75 hr
    Licensing and Joint Defense Agreements

    Edward A. Cavazos, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Austin, TX

    Joint defense agreements and patent licenses/settlement agreements arise in almost all complex patent cases. Examine the key issues litigators need to consider when drafting, negotiating and advising clients about these critical contracts. 
  • 3:05 pm
    Break

  • 3:15 pm
    0.75 hr
    Damages

    David J. Healey, Fish & Richardson P.C. - Houston, TX

    A discussion of the current damages landscape, including royalty stacking, FRAND terms, as well as the impact of recent decisions providing guidance on acceptable patent damages methodology.
  • 4:00 pm
    1.00 hr
    0.50 hr ethics
    Judicial Panel

    Moderator:
    Hon. David J. Folsom, Jackson Walker L.L.P. - Texarkana, TX
    Panelists:
    Hon. Paul Singh Grewal, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California - San Jose, CA
    Hon. John D. Love, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Tyler, TX
    Hon. Robert L. Pitman, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - San Antonio and Austin, TX
    Hon. Robert W. Schroeder III, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Texarkana, TX

    Distinguished judges from the District Court discuss their experiences hearing and trying patent cases.
  • 5:00 pm
    Adjourn

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Friday Morning
    Presiding Officer:
    Michael P. Adams, Jackson Walker L.L.P. - Austin, TX
  • 7:30 am
    Austin Only
    Conference Room Opens

    Includes continental breakfast.
  • 8:30 am
    0.75 hr ethics
    Ethics before the USPTO

    David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP - Macon and Atlanta, GA

    An examination of the less obvious ways that inefficient or incompetent prosecution can harm clients, and a look at recent conflicts of interest cases in patent and trademark practice.
  • 9:15 am
    0.75 hr
    Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

    Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas - Houston, TX
    Hon. Xavier Rodriguez, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - San Antonio, TX

    Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure aim to expedite proceedings, promote greater judicial involvement in case management, address proportionality in discovery, and alter the sanctions analysis.  Explore these changes and hear tips for navigating them. 
  • 10:00 am
    Break

  • Tactical Considerations at the PTAB
  • 10:15 am
    0.50 hr
    PTAB Update

    Hon. Miriam L. Quinn, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board - Dallas, TX

    An update on AIA trial practice and rules at the PTAB.  
  • 10:45 am
    0.50 hr
    PTAB Procedural Developments

    Moderator:
    David L. McCombs, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Dallas, TX
    Panelists:
    Kyle E. Friesen, Mayer Brown LLP - Houston, TX
    Daniel S. Block, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
    Theodore M. Foster, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Richardson, TX

    An analysis of the procedural aspects of PTAB practice, directed to recent developments and their impact on overall case strategy—including stay of District Court litigation, redundancy rulings and how to avoid them, and new rules and proposed legislation.
  • 11:15 am
    1.00 hr
    PTAB Trial Strategy

    Moderator:
    David L. McCombs, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Dallas, TX
    Panelists:
    Sharon A. Israel, Mayer Brown LLP - Houston, TX
    Robert Greene Sterne, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
    Christopher J. Lewis, FLIR Systems, Inc. - Wilsonville, OR

    A discussion of PTAB trials and experience from real cases on what works most effectively, mistakes to avoid, and the interplay with District court litigation—including real party in interest and privy considerations, the present and future of amendment practice, litigation coordination and how to deal with conflicting decisions, and corrected filings and tactics.
  • 12:15 pm
    Austin Only
    Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)

    Included in registration.
  • Friday Afternoon
    Presiding Officer:
    James D. Woods, BDO USA, LLP - Houston, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • Thank You to Our Exclusive Sponsor

    McKool Smith
  • 12:35 pm
    0.75 hr
    Supreme Court Update

    John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX

    The Supreme Court continues to intervene regularly in patent matters. Review the recent decisions and patterns in both the Court’s and individual Justices’ approaches.
  • 1:20 pm
    Break

  • 1:35 pm
    0.75 hr
    Federal Circuit Year in Review

    Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP - Stanford and San Francisco, CA

    An overview of the year in patent decisions.
  • 2:20 pm
    0.50 hr
    U.S. Patent Reform:  Where Are We Now?

    Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea, Crowell & Moring, LLP - Washington, DC

    The activity in Congress involving patent reform is constantly evolving.  Hear more on Congress' current positions, as well as State legislation directed to bad faith patent assertions.
  • 2:50 pm
    0.50 hr ethics
    Attorney Beware! Client’s Inequitable Conduct Can Lead to Attorney Liability

    Darryl J. Adams, Baker Botts - Austin, TX
    Tecuan Flores, Baker Botts - Austin, TX

    A review of inequitable conduct cases since Therasense, a look at the recent trend of attorney sanctions for representing clients that commit inequitable conduct, plus tips and considerations for avoiding attorney liability.
  • 3:20 pm
    0.75 hr ethics
    Ethics in Negotiation: The True Cost of Representation

    Michael J. Golden, Boulette Golden & Marin L.L.P. - Austin, TX

    When a client discloses a terrible truth or reveals an unspeakable purpose, what obligations do the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Conduct place on an attorney? What happens when it’s time for an attorney to move on? Explore the unexpected answers given by the Rules using both recent and historical real world cases. 
  • 4:05 pm
    Adjourn

Conference Faculty

Kenneth R. Adamo

Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Chicago, IL

Darryl J. Adams

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Marta Y. Beckwith

Aruba Networks, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA

Daniel S. Block

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC

Edward A. Cavazos

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Austin, TX

Max Ciccarelli

Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX

Tecuan Flores

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Hon. David J. Folsom

Jackson Walker L.L.P.
Texarkana, TX

Theodore M. Foster

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Richardson, TX

Kyle E. Friesen

Mayer Brown LLP
Houston, TX

Hilda C. Galvan

Jones Day
Dallas, TX

John M. Golden

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Michael J. Golden

Boulette Golden & Marin L.L.P.
Austin, TX

Hon. Paul Singh Grewal

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
San Jose, CA

David J. Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

David Hricik

Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP
Macon and Atlanta, GA

Sharon A. Israel

Mayer Brown LLP
Houston, TX

Robert L. King

Silicon Labs
Austin, TX

Kevin Kudlac

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Austin, TX

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

Christopher J. Lewis

FLIR Systems, Inc.
Wilsonville, OR

Hon. John D. Love

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Tyler, TX

Keith Lutsch

Blank Rome LLP
Houston, TX

David L. McCombs

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX

Andrew Metrailer

Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX

Michael W. Piper

Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX

Hon. Robert L. Pitman

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
San Antonio and Austin, TX

Hon. Miriam L. Quinn

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Dallas, TX

Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea

Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC

Hon. Xavier Rodriguez

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
San Antonio, TX

Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
Houston, TX

Hon. Robert W. Schroeder III

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Texarkana, TX

Russell Slifer

Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Robert Greene Sterne

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC

David P. Swenson

Farney Daniels PC
Minneapolis, MN

Rene A. Trevino

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Houston, TX

Ana C. Ward

Award Ventures, LLC
Austin, TX

Planning Committee

Robert L. King—Co-Chair

Silicon Labs
Austin, TX

Kevin J. Meek—Co-Chair

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Michael P. Adams

Jackson Walker L.L.P.
Austin, TX

Tom Adolph

Adolph Locklar
Houston, TX

Alan D. Albright

Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
Austin, TX

Michael C. Barrett

Cirrus Logic
Austin, TX

Brent K. Bersin

Duff and Phelps
Houston, TX

Jane Politz Brandt

Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX

Christa Brown-Sanford

Baker Botts
Dallas, TX

Bryan Farney

Farney Daniels PC
Georgetown, TX

John D. Flynn

IBM Corporation
Austin, TX

Hilda C. Galvan

Jones Day
Dallas, TX

John Garvish

McKool Smith
Austin, TX

Jonathan N. Geld

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Austin, TX

John M. Golden

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

David J. Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

Joanna Jefferson

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Kevin Kudlac

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Austin, TX

William L. LaFuze

McKool Smith
Houston, TX

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

David L. McCombs

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX

Eric L. Natinsky

Quick Technologies Inc.
Austin, TX

Floyd R. Nation

Law Offices of Floyd R. Nation
San Antonio, TX

James J. Nawrocki

IPFC Corp.
Houston, TX

David W. O'Brien

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX

Mark E. Patrick

Texas Instruments Incorporated
Dallas, TX

Louis A. Riley

McAfee, Inc.
Plano, TX

Jennie Salazar

The JLSalazar Law Firm, PLLC
Houston, TX

Mark E. Scott

Conley Rose, PC
Austin, TX

José C. Villarreal

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
West Lake Hills, TX

Ana C. Ward

Award Ventures, LLC
Austin, TX

Shirley Webster

Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX

William D. Wiese

DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P.
Austin, TX

Keith E. Witek

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Austin, TX

James D. Woods

BDO USA, LLP
Houston, TX

Credit Info

MCLE Credit
A Texas MCLE Reporting Form will be included in your course materials. Please complete and return to the registration desk and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas, or you can self-report your credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com. A Certificate of Attendance will be provided at the conference to keep for your records.  
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider (#1944), and the State Bar of California is a New York Approved Jurisdiction, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the New York State Bar Association. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to The Supreme Court of Ohio within 30 days after the conference. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records.
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the conference.
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive the Pennsylvania CLE Board Credit Request Form and approval documentation to self-report credit directly to the Pennsylvania CLE Board. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Note on Self-Reporting Your Credits in Another State
If you wish to satisfy MCLE or other professional education requirements in another state for a program offered by the University of Texas School of Law, please check with the state bar or other licensing authority in that state before taking the program to ensure it will qualify for self-reporting your credits.
Other Credit
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live conferences are presumptively approved by The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Accounting CPE Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Texas Accounting Certificate of Completion at the conference for your records. Self-report your CPE credit directly to TSBPA. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

Contact Laura Tolin, ltolin@law.utexas.edu, if you have additional questions.
MCLE Credit
UT Law CLE will report credit to the State Bar of Texas on your behalf. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com. A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit.
Self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov. Print and keep the Certificate of Completion for your records. A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit.
At the conference, you will need to sign in on the Record of Attendance form at the registration desk. You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the conference to keep for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations.

New Jersey MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim New York MCLE credit, New Jersey credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on CLE.
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider (#1944), and the State Bar of California is a New York Approved Jurisdiction, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines.

New York MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim New York MCLE credit, New York credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the New York State CLE Board.
No Additional Credit Information.
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #169) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Oklahoma Bar Association for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Oklahoma MCLE credit, Oklahoma credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the webcast.
Other Credit
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Texas Accounting CPE credit, the Texas Accounting CPE credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your CPE credit directly to the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

Contact Laura Tolin, ltolin@law.utexas.edu, if you have additional questions.

Key Dates

Austin – Nov 5-6, 2015 – Four Seasons Hotel
Conference Concluded
Live Webcast – Nov 5-6, 2015
Conference Concluded
Buy
Austin
Last day for Individual early registration: Oct 30, 2015

Add $50 for registrations received after this time

Last day for Group (5 registrants minimum) early registration: Oct 30, 2015

Add $50 for registrations received after this time

Last day for Group (10 registrants minimum) early registration: Oct 30, 2015

Add $50 for registrations received after this time

Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 30, 2015
Last day for cancellation (partial refund): Nov 2, 2015

$50 processing fee applied

Live Webcast
Last day for Individual early registration: Nov 6, 2015

Add $0 for registrations received after this time

Last day for Group (5 registrants minimum) early registration: Nov 6, 2015

Add $0 for registrations received after this time

Last day for Group (10 registrants minimum) early registration: Nov 6, 2015

Add $0 for registrations received after this time

Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 30, 2015
Last day for cancellation (partial refund): Nov 2, 2015

$50 processing fee applied

Venue

speaker

98 San Jacinto Boulevard
Austin, TX 78701-4082
512.685.8100 (reservations)
Map

Accommodations

The Four Seasons Hotel is sold out.  The following hotels currently have availability:  

Hyatt Place Austin Downtown
Sheraton Austin Hotel at the Capitol

Parking Information

$12 Event Daily; $16 Valet Daily; $32.50 Overnight Self-Parking or Valet.

Our Sponsors

Subscribe to Our Hooked on CLE Monthly Newsletter