University of Texas Law logo Update your account
  • Sign in or Join Account and Briefcase
    Not a member yet? Sign up Forgot password?
  • Accredited CLE
    Live Conferences Studio Webcasts eConferences eCourses Hooked on CLE Answer Bar
  • Research & Self-Study
    Materials eLibrary
  • Subscriptions
    MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
  • Browse by Practice Area
    Administrative Admiralty and Maritime Alternative Dispute Resolution Appellate - Civil and Criminal Bankruptcy Business Entities Civil Rights Construction Corporate Counsel Criminal Cybersecurity Elder Law and Guardianship Employment Entertainment and Sports Law Environmental Essentials Ethics Exempt Organizations / Nonprofits Family Government Enforcement / White Collar Crime Healthcare Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property / Patent Law International Law Practice Management Litigation M&A and Securities Oil, Gas and Energy Practice Skills Real Estate Renewable Energy School Self-Care Taxation Technology Technology for Lawyers Trusts and Estates / Probate Water
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart

What are you searching for?

Skip to main content
UT Law CLE logo
  • Overview /
  • Schedule /
  • Faculty /
  • Credit Info /
  • Key Dates /
  • Venue /
  • Sponsors
Register or Buy ticket icon Buy
Conference art

23rd Annual

Advanced Patent Law Institute

Austin Nov 1-2, 2018 Four Seasons Hotel
Conference Concluded
Live Webcast Nov 1-2, 2018
Conference Concluded
Buy
Related products: eConference Materials
PREMIER SPONSOR
IPFC Corp.

EVENT SPONSORS
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Vinson & Elkins LLP

WEBCAST SPONSOR
StoneTurn

SPONSORS
Conley Rose, P.C.
DuBois Bryant & Campbell
Duff & Phelps
Dykema Cox Smith
Haynes and Boone, LLP
McKool Smith
Norton Rose Fulbright
Ocean Tomo
PatentDesigns.net
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Thompson & Knight LLP
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Winstead PC
Brochure thumbnail
Download Brochure (PDF)

Overview

UT Law's 23rd Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute in Austin covers the latest developments in patent law and features a sophisticated array of prosecution and litigation topics. Hear from nationally recognized faculty including senior IP counsel of major corporations, patent prosecution and litigation experts from around the nation, U.S. District Court Judges, and leading academics. This year’s program features:

  • A review of the year’s key Federal Circuit and Supreme Court cases by Mark A. Lemley.
  • A discussion on the Global Patent Landscape, moderated by Robert Greene Sterne and including former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit, Paul R. Michel, including practical guidance on how to navigate and adapt to a new “reality” in global patent enforcement and monetization.
  • Prosecution strategies and analysis, including approaches to gain insight into patent examiners and art units.
  • Recent Developments in Claims Construction with Kenneth R. Adamo.
  • Advanced IPR tactics and “survival” strategies.
  • A look at changes to venue rules and the rise of multi-district litigation.
  • Section 101 and a look at how the courts and USPTO continue to apply Alice.
  • An examination of evolving damages case law and strategies for apportionment and lost-profit determinations.
  • The popular U.S. District Court Judicial Panel, moderated by Hon. Alan D Albright.
  • 3.00 hours of ethics, including presentations on Tricky Ethics Issues for IP Lawyers with Michael E. McCabe, and Practicing IP Law Ethically in the Cloud with David Hricik.
  • Multiple networking opportunities with program faculty and fellow practitioners, including the Thursday Evening Networking Reception. 

  • Buy

Event Schedule

Program is subject to change.
All times are Central Time Zone.

  • Day 1 November 1, 2018
  • Day 2 November 2, 2018
  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Thursday Morning, Nov. 1, 2018
    Presiding Officer:
    Sheila Kadura, Dell - Round Rock, TX
  • 7:30 am
    Austin Only
    Registration Opens
    Includes continental breakfast.

  • 8:20 am
    Welcoming Remarks

  • 8:30 am
    0.75 hr
    Recent Developments in Claims Construction
    The driver of patent application preparation/prosecution, district court trials, Federal Circuit appeals, and AIA post-grant review proceedings, remains—claim construction. Review 2017-2018 claim construction cases and issues at the Federal Circuit and trial court levels. And examine the PTAB’s procedural and substantive claim construction “rules, practices and etc.," including the PTAB proposal to drop BRI and adopt Phillips construction under all circumstances, and possible rule and practice changes to mandate PTAB consideration of claim constructions from other proceedings.

    Kenneth R. Adamo, Kirkland & Ellis LLP - Chicago, IL

  • 9:15 am
    0.75 hr
    Changes to Venue Rules and the Rise of Multi-District Litigation
    The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland has changed the landscape for patent venue. Explore what constitutes a company’s “regular and established place of business” and the possible impact of this recent case.

    Darlene Ghavimi, Conley Rose, PC - Austin, TX
    Sherri Wilson, Dykema Cox Smith - Austin, TX

  • 10:00 am
    Break

  • 10:15 am
    0.75 hr
    Section 101 Update
    A review of the trends, recent cases, and developments in the courts and at the USPTO regarding section 101 as Alice turns five. Gain practical advice for avoiding and overcoming assertions of invalidity under section 101, as well as for making and winning assertions of invalidity under 101.

    Steve Borgman, Vinson & Elkins LLP - Houston, TX
    Janice Le Ta, Vinson & Elkins LLP - Austin, TX

  • 11:00 am
    0.75 hr
    Getting Into the Examiner's Head: Interviews, Insight, and Analytics as Tools to Aim and Focus Your Prosecution
    Discuss approaches to gain insight into examiners, supervisors, and art units beyond the face of the office action, to more efficiently and effectively prosecute applications. Hear thoughts on the analysis of search strategies used by the examiner, the effective use of analytics about the examiner and art unit, and how to leverage interviews and particularly the FAIPP interview program towards these ends.

    Christa Brown-Sanford, Baker Botts - Dallas, TX
    Stephen Key, patentKEY - Alexandria, VA
    Michael W. Piper, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX

  • 11:45 am
    0.75 hr ethics
    No Candy for You: Tricky Ethics Issues for IP Lawyers
    The ethics rules of the USPTO present challenging dilemmas for even the most experienced patent and trademark practitioners. Find out where the ethical dangers lurk and how you can avoid becoming a cautionary tale.

    Michael E. McCabe Jr., McCabe Law LLC - Potomac, MD

  • 12:30 pm
    Austin Only
    Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)
    Included in registration.

  • Thursday Afternoon, Nov. 1, 2018
    Presiding Officer:
    Robert L. King, Silicon Labs - Austin, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • Thank You to Our Sponsor
    Baker Botts L.L.P.

  • 12:50 pm
    0.50 hr
    Blockchain and Smart Contracts
    A discussion of how blockchains work, how blockchains can form a platform for the operation of smart contracts and distributed applications (dApps), and potential legal issues raised by such platforms.

    James A. Cox, Jones Day - Dallas, TX

  • 1:20 pm
    Break

  • 1:35 pm
    1.00 hr
    Advanced IPR Tactics/Impact of Oil States
    Panelists discuss institution and trial post-SAS Institute, discretionary denials under 314(a), 325(d), significant developments regarding privies and real parties-in-interest, and a host of additional developments at the PTAB and Federal Circuit that suggest a rebalancing toward patent owners.

    Moderator:
    David W. O'Brien, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Austin, TX
    Panelists:
    Peter J. Ayers, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, PLLC - Austin, TX
    Brian W. Oaks, Baker Botts - Austin, TX
    Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea, Crowell & Moring, LLP - Washington, DC

  • 2:35 pm
    0.50 hr
    Crafting Patents to Survive IPR Attack
    Tips for drafting durable patent applications and navigating carefully though examination to bolster patents and forestall their early demise.

    Heather L. Flanagan PhD, Fish & Richardson P.C. - Austin, TX

  • 3:05 pm
    0.75 hr
    Standard Essential Patents and FRAND
    A discussion on how these issues are handled in the U.S., with some comparison to Germany, the U.K., and China.

    Melissa Hotze, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP - Houston, TX
    Garland T. Stephens, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP - Houston, TX

  • 3:50 pm
    Break

  • 4:00 pm
    0.75 hr
    Damages, Apportionment, and Lost Profits
    Evolving damages case law requires practitioners to consider recent decisions in formulating their damages claim or defense. Hear a discussion of recent case law and its impact on damage theories and the legal strategies. Explore strategies for apportionment, lost profits determinations, and non-infringing alternatives.

    Stephanie DeBrow, Norton Rose Fulbright - Austin, TX
    Stephen Dell, IPFC Corp. - Houston, TX

  • 4:45 pm
    1.00 hr
    0.50 hr ethics
    Judicial Panel
    Hear distinguished judges from the District Court discuss their experiences hearing and trying patent cases.

    Hon. Alan D Albright, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - Waco, TX
    Hon. Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Plano, TX

  • 5:45 pm
    Adjourn


  • Austin Only
    Networking Reception (in Austin from 5:45 p.m. – 6:45 p.m.)
    Join us for drinks and hors d'oeuvres with program faculty and attendees.
     
    Thank You to Our Sponsor
    Vinson & Elkins LLP

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Friday Morning, Nov. 2, 2018
    Presiding Officer:
    Shirley Webster, Ocean Tomo, LLC - Houston, TX
  • 7:30 am
    Austin Only
    Conference Room Opens
    Includes continental breakfast.

  • BREAKFAST PRESENTATION
  • 8:00 am
    0.75 hr
    0.25 hr ethics
    Women in IP Friday Breakfast Presentation: The Impact of Corporate Structure Change on Intellectual Property
    Hear what experts want you to know about the IP of M&A.

    Moderator:
    Elise Selinger, Patterson + Sheridan LLP - Dallas, TX
    Panelists:
    Margaret J. Sampson, Baker Botts - Austin, TX
    Erin Ator Thomson, Shattuck Labs, Inc. - Austin, TX
    Kim M. Vo, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. - Austin, TX

  • 8:45 am
    Break

  • 9:00 am
    1.00 hr
    The Global Patent Landscape
    Examine in the new "reality" of global patent enforcement and monetization, as well as practical guidance on how to navigate these new realities and possible strategies to adapt to the new landscape.

    Moderator:
    Robert Greene Sterne, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
    Panelists:
    Paul Evans, Predictive Technology Group - Salt Lake City, UT
    Damon C. Matteo, Fulcrum Strategy - Palo Alto, CA
    Hon. Paul R. Michel, Chief Judge, Retired, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Washington, DC
    Wayne P. Sobon, Juul Labs - San Francisco, CA

  • 10:00 am
    0.50 hr
    Are We Exhausted Yet? Post-Sale Restrictions After Lexmark
    An exploration of recent decisions upending long-established Federal Circuit precedent regarding exhaustion of U.S. patent rights for products sold domestically and internationally.

    Adrienne E. Dominguez, Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas, TX

  • 10:30 am
    Break

  • 10:45 am
    0.75 hr
    Extraterritoriality: When Acts Overseas Create Liability under U.S. Patent Law
    Despite language in 35 U.S.C. 271 limiting infringement liability for acts “within the United States”, depending upon the type of infringement and/or type of claim, liability can arise based mainly or completely on acts outside of the United States. Examine the meaning of “within the United States” and when liability arises for acts outside of the U.S.

    Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey, Fish & Richardson P.C. - Houston, TX

  • 11:30 am
    1.00 hr
    Federal Circuit and SCOTUS Update
    A whirlwind summary of the most important developments in Supreme Court and Federal Circuit case law over the last year.

    Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP - Stanford and San Francisco, CA

  • 12:30 pm
    Austin Only
    Pick Up Lunch (in Austin)
    Included in registration.

  • Friday Afternoon, Nov. 2, 2018
    Presiding Officer:
    Michael P. Adams, Dykema Cox Smith - Austin, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • Thank You to Our Sponsor
    Dickinson Wright PLLC

  • 12:50 pm
    0.75 hr
    Decreasing the USPTO's Incentive to Grant Invalid Patents
    Many believe the USPTO is issuing too many invalid patents that are unnecessarily reducing consumer welfare, stunting productive research, and discouraging innovation. To date, patent policy reforms to increase patent quality at the USPTO have been overly reliant on anecdotes and hunches. Review new empirical studies of the administrative process for granting patents which propose three changes to the patent system that would reduce the issuance of patents of questionable validity.

    Melissa Wasserman, The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX

  • 1:35 pm
    Break

  • 1:50 pm
    0.50 hr
    Divided Infringement
    Examine recent interpretations of the Akamai test and the impact on divided infringement cases. 

    Brian C. Nash, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Austin, TX

  • 2:20 pm
    0.75 hr ethics
    Defending Against Willful Infringement in a Post-Halo World
    With the changes resulting from the Supreme Court’s Halo opinion, there is additional importance placed on accused infringers in building a record that supports reasonableness of their decision to continue their accused operations. This often includes advice of competent counsel used to bolster the claim that they were not acting with subjective bad faith. Those using advice of counsel in defense of willfulness must be mindful of the scope of potential privilege waiver, and proactively take steps aimed at avoiding privilege waiver from extending to communications with trial counsel.

    Ross Spencer Garsson, Dickinson Wright PLLC - Austin, TX

  • 3:05 pm
    0.75 hr ethics
    Practicing IP Law Ethically in the Cloud: From the Mundane to the Ethics of AI
    Learn how to practice competently and ethically, including maintaining client confidentiality, avoiding conflicts of interest, and safely using social media. In addition, examine the questions that lawyers should ask before using computer-augmented legal services, such as automated contract review, legal research, and patent application drafting services. 

    David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP - Macon and Atlanta, GA

  • 3:50 pm
    Adjourn

  • Day 1 November 1, 2018
  • Day 2 November 2, 2018
Download Schedule

Conference Faculty

Kenneth R. Adamo

Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Chicago, IL

Hon. Alan D Albright

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Waco, TX

Peter J. Ayers

Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, PLLC
Austin, TX

Steve Borgman

Vinson & Elkins LLP
Houston, TX

Christa Brown-Sanford

Baker Botts
Dallas, TX

James A. Cox

Jones Day
Dallas, TX

Stephanie DeBrow

Norton Rose Fulbright
Austin, TX

Stephen Dell

IPFC Corp.
Houston, TX

Adrienne E. Dominguez

Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX

Paul Evans

Predictive Technology Group
Salt Lake City, UT

Heather L. Flanagan PhD

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Austin, TX

Ross Spencer Garsson

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Austin, TX

Darlene Ghavimi

Conley Rose, PC
Austin, TX

Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

Melissa Hotze

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Houston, TX

David Hricik

Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP
Macon and Atlanta, GA

Stephen Key

patentKEY
Alexandria, VA

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

Damon C. Matteo

Fulcrum Strategy
Palo Alto, CA

Michael E. McCabe Jr.

McCabe Law LLC
Potomac, MD

Hon. Paul R. Michel

Chief Judge, Retired, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Washington, DC

Brian C. Nash

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Austin, TX

David W. O'Brien

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX

Brian W. Oaks

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Michael W. Piper

Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX

Hon. Kimberly C. Priest Johnson

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Plano, TX

Hon. Teresa Stanek Rea

Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC

Margaret J. Sampson

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Elise Selinger

Patterson + Sheridan LLP
Dallas, TX

Wayne P. Sobon

Juul Labs
San Francisco, CA

Garland T. Stephens

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Houston, TX

Robert Greene Sterne

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC

Janice Le Ta

Vinson & Elkins LLP
Austin, TX

Erin Ator Thomson

Shattuck Labs, Inc.
Austin, TX

Kim M. Vo

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Austin, TX

Melissa Wasserman

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Sherri Wilson

Dykema Cox Smith
Austin, TX

Planning Committee

Sheila Kadura—Co-Chair

Dell
Round Rock, TX

Kevin J. Meek—Co-Chair

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Michael P. Adams

Dykema Cox Smith
Austin, TX

Tom Adolph

Adolph Locklar
Houston, TX

Hon. Alan D Albright

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Waco, TX

Michael C. Barrett

Cirrus Logic
Austin, TX

Steve Borgman

Vinson & Elkins LLP
Houston, TX

Christa Brown-Sanford

Baker Botts
Dallas, TX

Thaddeus J. Faleski III

Conley Rose, PC
Houston, TX

Heather L. Flanagan PhD

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Austin, TX

John D. Flynn

IBM Corporation
Austin, TX

Mark Thomas Garrett

Norton Rose Fulbright
Austin, TX

John M. Golden

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

John M. Guaragna

DLA Piper LLP US
Austin, TX

Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

Joanna Jefferson

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Robert L. King

Silicon Labs
Austin, TX

Kevin Kudlac

Connor Kudlac Lee, PLLC
Austin, TX

William L. LaFuze

McKool Smith
Houston, TX

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

David L. McCombs

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX

Eric L. Natinsky

Quick Technologies Inc.
Austin, TX

David W. O'Brien

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX

Mark E. Patrick

Texas Instruments Incorporated
Dallas, TX

Jennie Salazar

The JLSalazar Law Firm, PLLC
Houston, TX

W. Todd Schoettelkotte

IPFC Corp.
Houston, TX

Mark E. Scott

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Austin, TX

Garland T. Stephens

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Houston, TX

Betty Ellsworth Ungerman

Lennox International Inc.
Richardson, TX

José C. Villarreal

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
West Lake Hills, TX

Kim M. Vo

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Austin, TX

Shirley Webster

Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX

William D. Wiese

DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P.
Austin, TX

Keith E. Witek

Tesla Motors
Austin, TX

James D. Woods

Economic Analytics Consulting, LLC
Houston, TX

Richard L. Wynne Jr.

Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX

Credit Info

  • Austin
  • Live Webcast
MCLE Credit
Toggle view Texas – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
You may claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas. A Certificate of Attendance will be provided in Your Briefcase for your records. The system reports Texas CLE credit every Tuesday. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com, using the course number  provided on your certificate of attendance.
Toggle view California – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE is required to provide the State Bar with electronic attendance records for any MCLE participatory activity within 60 days of completion of the activity. The California licensee is responsible for reporting their compliance/credit hours earned to the State Bar at the end of their reporting period directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov.  UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Toggle view Illinois – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
Within 10 days of the conference you must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, then you will be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Failure to submit your credit within 10 days may result in attendance not being reported or may result in additional fees being assessed to you for credit reporting. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
Toggle view New Jersey – 16.00 hrs  |  3.30 hrs Ethics
As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations (PDF).

At the conclusion of the conference you  will need to claim and certify your credit online, in your UTCLE "Briefcase", you will then be provided a certificate of attendance . Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.
Toggle view New York – 16.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
As The University of Texas School of Law is a Oklahoma Bar Association presumptively approved MCLE provider (#169), and the Oklahoma is a New York Approved Jurisdiction on List A, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines (PDF).

 You must claim and certify your credit online in your UTCLE "Briefcase", and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. Self-report your CLE credit directly to the New York State Bar Association. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Toggle view Ohio – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
You must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to The Supreme Court of Ohio within 30 days after the conference. 
Toggle view Oklahoma – 18.00 hrs  |  3.50 hrs Ethics
You must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, then you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the conference.
Toggle view Pennsylvania – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
UT Law CLE is an approved provider of Pennsylvania credit, sponsor #236. You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. Attorney attendance will be reported to Pennsylvania within 2 weeks after credit is claimed and submit. Attorneys are not able to report this credit on their own, and UT Law CLE pays all associated fees for the credit hours. Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.
Other Credit
Toggle view TX Accounting CPE – 18.00 hrs
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live conferences are presumptively approved by The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

At the conference, you are welcome to sign in on the Accounting CPE Record of Attendance form at the registration desk, but we are now reporting all credit online. You will receive a Texas Accounting Certificate of Completion in Your Briefcase. Self-report your CPE credit directly to TSBPA. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.
MCLE Credit
Toggle view Texas – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
You may claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas.  A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit. The system reports Texas CLE credit every Tuesday. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com, using the course number  provided on your certificate of attendance.
Toggle view California – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim California MCLE credit, California credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE is required to provide the State Bar with electronic attendance records for any MCLE participatory activity within 60 days of completion of the activity. The California licensee is responsible for reporting their compliance/credit hours earned to the State Bar at the end of their reporting period directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov.  UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Illinois – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim Illinois MCLE credit, Illinois credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Within 10 days of the conference you must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, then you will be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Failure to submit your credit within 10 days may result in attendance not being reported or may result in additional fees being assessed to you for credit reporting. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view New Jersey – 16.00 hrs  |  3.30 hrs Ethics
To claim New Jersey MCLE credit, New Jersey credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. At the conclusion of the conference you will need to claim and certify your credit online, in your UTCLE "Briefcase". Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years. Self-report your credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on CLE.

As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations (PDF).

New Jersey MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

 
Toggle view New York – 16.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim New York MCLE credit, New York credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.   

As The University of Texas School of Law is a Oklahoma Bar Association presumptively approved MCLE provider (#169), and the Oklahoma is a New York Approved Jurisdiction on List A, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines (PDF).

Upon claiming and certifying your credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the New York State CLE Board.

New York MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
 
Toggle view Oklahoma – 18.00 hrs  |  3.50 hrs Ethics
To claim Oklahoma MCLE credit, Oklahoma credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #169) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Oklahoma Bar Association for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the webcast.
Toggle view Other States – 15.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
Note on Self-Reporting Your Credits in Another State
If you wish to satisfy MCLE or other professional education requirements in another state for a program offered by the University of Texas School of Law, please check with the state bar or other licensing authority in that state to ensure it will qualify for self-reporting your credits.
 
To claim Other States MCLE credit, Other States credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. You must claim and  certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records and to provide to other licensing authorities as needed. 

This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Other Credit
Toggle view TX Accounting CPE – 18.00 hrs
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Texas Accounting CPE credit, the Texas Accounting CPE credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your CPE credit directly to the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.

Key Dates

Austin – Nov 1-2, 2018 – Four Seasons Hotel
Conference Concluded
Live Webcast – Nov 1-2, 2018
Conference Concluded
Buy
  • Austin
  • Live Webcast
Individual
Last day for $745.00 Regular pricing: Oct 24, 2018

$795.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (5 registrants minimum)
Last day for $671.00 Regular pricing: Oct 24, 2018

$671.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (10 registrants minimum)
Last day for $596.00 Regular pricing: Oct 24, 2018

$596.00 for registrations received after this time

Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 26, 2018

$50 processing fee applied after this date

Last day for cancellation: Oct 29, 2018
Individual
Group (5 registrants minimum)
Group (10 registrants minimum)
Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 26, 2018

$50 processing fee applied after this date

Last day for cancellation: Oct 29, 2018

Venue

speaker

Four Seasons Hotel

98 San Jacinto Boulevard
Austin, TX 78701-4082
512-478-4500 (reservations)
Map

Accommodations

A limited amount of city view rooms are available at a special room rate of $285/night and lake view rooms are $310/night. To receive the discounted rates, please contact the reservations department at 512-685-8100 and mention UT Law Patent Law 2018. Rates will be available until October 5, 2018 or until the room block is exhausted, whichever comes first. 

Parking Information

$12 daily self-parking; $16 valet
$45 overnight self or valet
(subject to change) 

Our Sponsors

Thank you to our sponsors! Click each logo below to learn more.

  • IPFC Corp. logo
    IPFC Corp.
    IPFC Corp. (“IPFC”) is an independent consulting firm that specializes in providing financial and economic assessments of intellectual property assets. Our professionals possess decades of experience providing financial consulting, valuation, damages analysis, and expert witness services to law firms and corporate clients in patent, trade secret, trademark, trade name, trade dress, and copyright infringement matters. Further, IPFC provides financial assessments in other types of corporate disputes, licensing negotiations, and for corporate finance purposes. IPFC has provided opinions and expert testimony in state and federal court, evaluating financial and economic damages in the form of lost profits, price erosion, reasonable royalties, convoyed sales, costs, unjust enrichment, and corrective advertising, among others. IPFC also has provided expert testimony before the International Trade Commission related to public interest, domestic industry, remedy, and bond issues in Section 337 investigations.
    ipfccorp.com
  • Baker Botts L.L.P. logo
    Baker Botts L.L.P.
    Baker Botts is a globally respected law firm whose reach and depth of understanding help deliver better, more innovative solutions to our clients. Our intellectual property lawyers offer a full-service IP practice, including strategic IP counseling; patent and trademark acquisition; patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret litigation; and copyright management and licensing in industries encompassing telecom, software, semiconductor, life sciences, energy, financial services, retail and more. The vast majority of our IP lawyers hold at least one engineering or science degree, and our IP practice consistently ranks in the top five in surveys by various prestigious publications. Most recently, Baker Botts’ Intellectual Property Practice was named the 2015 Texas Lawyer IP Litigation Department of the Year.
    bakerbotts.com
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC logo
    Dickinson Wright PLLC
    Dickinson Wright PLLC is a general practice law firm with more than 475 attorneys across 40 practice areas. The firm has nineteen offices spanning nine states – including the Austin, Texas office that opened in July 2016. Dickinson Wright offers clients a distinctive combination of superb client service, exceptional quality, value for fees, industry expertise, and business acumen. Our deep specialization is particularly notable in members of our Intellectual Property team, which includes over 40 scientists and engineers who hold B.S, M.S, and Ph.D. degrees in a wide range of disciplines. Dickinson Wright lawyers are regularly cited by Chambers, Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers, and other leading evaluating organizations.
    dickinsonwright.com
  • Fish & Richardson P.C. logo
    Fish & Richardson P.C.
    Fish & Richardson is a global intellectual property law firm offering patent, trademark and copyright prosecution and counseling, intellectual property litigation, and commercial litigation services. The firm has more than 400 attorneys and technology specialists in the U.S. and Europe. Our success is rooted in our creative and inclusive culture, which values the diversity of people, experiences, and perspectives. Fish is the No. 1 U.S. patent litigation firm, handling nearly three times as many cases as its nearest competitor; a powerhouse patent and trademark prosecution firm; a top-tier trademark and copyright litigation firm; and the No. 1 firm at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, with more cases than any other firm. Since 1878, Fish attorneys have been winning cases worth billions in controversy – often by making new law – for the world’s most innovative and influential technology leaders. For more information, visit https://www.fr.com or follow us at @FishRichardson
    fr.com
  • Vinson & Elkins LLP logo
    Vinson & Elkins LLP
    Founded a century ago, Vinson & Elkins is an international law firm with over 650 attorneys in 15 offices across the globe. V&E lawyers provide legal services to some of the world's largest and most sophisticated business enterprises, addressing a multitude of challenging litigation, transactional and regulatory matters. Our firm established its Intellectual Property practice in 1927, one of the first for U.S. firms, which remains an essential part of V&E today. From litigation, post-grant proceedings and patent prosecution to licensing and other transactions, our intellectual property lawyers combine tremendous legal acumen with technical backgrounds in areas such as engineering, chemistry, and life sciences to develop comprehensive solutions for our clients’ IP needs.
     
    velaw.com
  • StoneTurn logo
    StoneTurn
    StoneTurn is a leading forensic accounting, corporate compliance and expert services firm that assists attorneys, corporations and government agencies on a range of high-stakes legal and risk-related issues. Our Intellectual Property experts have extensive experience in both litigation and transactional matters. We provide economic damages quantification in IP disputes, and valuation, licensing and royalty compliance services to entities ranging from multinational corporations to emerging enterprises. Learn more at StoneTurn.com
    stoneturn.com
  • Conley Rose, P.C. logo
    Conley Rose, P.C.
    Conley Rose is a Texas-based intellectual property firm offering a complete range of services for technology-driven companies and entrepreneurs. Our clients’ needs for sophisticated intellectual property services have enabled us to grow to a firm of over forty IP-focused professionals servicing clients worldwide from our offices in Houston, Dallas, and Austin. For more than 25 years, Conley Rose has prepared, procured and maintained patents, trademarks, and copyrights, and it has continued to both enforce clients’ intellectual property rights against infringers and defend its clients against claims of infringement. Conley Rose also has a robust transactional practice, including the drafting and negotiation of intellectual property transfer, license, and development agreements, as well as preparing and providing portfolio analyses, legal opinions, due diligence review and counseling.
    conleyrose.com
  • DuBois Bryant & Campbell logo
    DuBois Bryant & Campbell
    DuBois, Bryant & Campbell is an Austin, Texas based law firm dedicated to providing top quality legal services to a broad range of clients. Clients across Texas have relied on DuBois Bryant & Campbell’s in-depth expertise and experience across a diverse range of practice areas, from intellectual property protection to complex commercial transactions.
    dbcllp.com
  • Duff & Phelps logo
    Duff & Phelps
    Duff & Phelps is the premier global valuation and corporate finance advisor with expertise in complex valuation, dispute and legal management consulting, M&A, restructuring, and compliance and regulatory consulting. The firm’s more than 2,000 employees serve a diverse range of clients from offices around the world. Duff & Phelps’ Intellectual Property Disputes practice provides independent expert analyses and consulting services to clients involved in complex IP disputes. Our team of economic, financial and accounting experts have significant experience in calculating and analyzing damages relating to: infringement of patents, trademarks, trade names, and copyrights; misappropriation of trade secrets; and license and valuation disputes. Our team adds value through all phases of litigation, including preliminary case assessment, expert reports, deposition and trial testimony, and post-verdict damages and impact analysis.
    duffandphelps.com
  • Dykema Cox Smith logo
    Dykema Cox Smith
    Dykema is a leading national law firm, serving business entities worldwide on a wide range of complex business issues.  With a fully mobile workforce of more than 400 professionals based in 13 offices located in California, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Texas and Washington, D.C., Dykema consistently delivers top value to clients.  

    Dykema is distinguished by our cost-effective and collaborative partnerships with our clients. We deliver practical, results-oriented counsel earning accolades from clients nationwide for our efforts on their behalf in the courtroom and in the boardroom. Unparalleled client service is at the heart of our approach to the practice of law. That focus has been a cornerstone of our success for the past 85 years. We hire the best and the brightest talents and instill in all a commitment to our clients’ satisfaction and the achievement of their business and legal goals.  
    dykema.com
  • Haynes and Boone, LLP logo
    Haynes and Boone, LLP
    Haynes and Boone, LLP is an international corporate law firm with offices in Texas, New York, California, Chicago, Denver, Washington, D.C., London, Mexico City and Shanghai, providing a full spectrum of legal services in technology, financial services, energy and private equity. With more than 575 lawyers, Haynes and Boone is ranked among the largest U.S.-based firms by The National Law Journal. The 2016 American Lawyer Corporate Scorecard rated the firm as one of the top two handling equities work for non-U.S. companies.
    haynesboone.com
  • McKool Smith logo
    McKool Smith
    In intellectual property cases, McKool Smith’s courtroom track record is unrivaled. Since 2006, the firm has secured night nine-figure patent infringement verdicts—more than any other law firm in the country—and ten eight-figure patent-infringement verdicts. As noted in Lex Machina's latest Patent Litigation Damages Report, since 2000, McKool Smith has won more patent litigation damages than any other law firm ($2.04 Billion). The firm was recognized as Managing IP’s 2017 “Plaintiff IP Firm of the Year” and in January 2016, McKool Smith was named “IP Firm of the Year” for the second consecutive year by Benchmark Litigation. The firm has also been awarded “IP Group of the Year” by Law360. These are just some of the accolades that have helped McKool Smith become what The Wall Street Journal describes as "...one of the biggest law firm success stories of the past decade."
    mckoolsmith.com
  • Norton Rose Fulbright logo
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice with approximately 4,000 lawyers based in more than 50 offices worldwide, providing the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. With more than 250 lawyers, patent attorneys and trademark agents across five continents, our global intellectual property team has extensive experience providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary IP law services to clients. Our  team has experience that spans the spectrum of issues that are crucial to companies that rely on IP assets for their success, including: obtaining, enforcing and licensing patents, trademarks and copyrights; litigating infringement claims; developing proactive enforcement strategies to protect IP; and auditing and assessing IP assets. Our lawyers are skilled at analyzing a company’s IP and developing strategic methods to protect it; as a result, businesses around the world choose us as their IP counsel. Many of our professionals hold scientific degrees, including masters and Ph.D.s, to complement their practical experience and combine deep industry and technical knowledge with broad legal understanding. 
    nortonrosefulbright.com
  • Ocean Tomo logo
    Ocean Tomo
    Established in 2003, Ocean Tomo, LLC, is the Intellectual Capital Merchant Banc™ firm providing Opinion, Management and Advisory services centered on intellectual property assets. Ocean Tomo assists clients—corporations, law firms, governments and institutional investors—in realizing Intellectual Capital Equity® value broadly defined. Practice offerings address financial expert testimony, valuation, strategy consulting, investment services, risk management products and transaction brokerage. Our comprehensive suite of products and services is built upon more than two decades of experience valuing intellectual property in the most rigorous of venues—Federal, State and international courts. Our financial, market and technical experts provide a unique understanding of the contributory value of proprietary innovation. This is the cornerstone of our business. This insight permeates every practice.
     
    oceantomo.com
  • PatentDesigns.net logo
    PatentDesigns.net
    PatentDesigns.net has been providing full-service patent illustration services for over 25 years, assisting in creating utility, design, and trademark drawings. We pride ourselves on quick turnaround, experience, unsurpassed quality, and exceptional customer service. Our large and diversified team of computer graphic artists, technical illustrators, and CAD operators enable us to provide a variety of services. We strive to provide our clients with superior patent drawings. Our pledge to establish lasting relationships by not just meeting expectations but exceeding them. We have a commitment to quality and the expertise to support the guidelines of the USPTO/PCT. As one of the largest patent drafting firms in the country, serving some of the largest IP firms and companies, we draw an average of 30,000 pages a year. Furthermore, we are technologically capable of providing our services globally; whether you are around the corner, or across the country, we look forward to assisting you and your team! 
    patentdesigns.net
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP logo
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a leading international law firm with offices around the world and an industry focus on energy & natural resources, financial services, real estate & construction and technology. Based in the world's major financial, technology and energy centers, Pillsbury counsels clients on global business, regulatory and litigation matters. Our intellectual property practice advises clients on developing successful and comprehensive IP strategies by protecting, managing, asserting, defending and leveraging their IP assets. 

    We field a team of more than 100 IP attorneys, plus technical consultants and patent agents from offices in key global financial and technology centers. Our IP team includes scientists and engineers with advanced degrees, including electrical and mechanical engineering, chemistry, biotechnology, physics and a number of other technical disciplines. Several team members are former U.S. Patent and Trademark Office examiners.
    pillsburylaw.com
  • Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox logo
    Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
    Founded in 1978 and based in Washington, D.C., Sterne Kessler is dedicated exclusively to the protection, transfer, and enforcement of intellectual property rights. Our team of attorneys, registered patent agents, students, and technical specialists include some of the country's most respected practitioners of intellectual property law. Most of our professionals hold an advanced level degree, including more than 50 masters degrees and almost 55 with a doctorate in science or engineering – credentials wide and deep enough to fill the faculty of a science-oriented university.
    sternekessler.com
  • Thompson & Knight LLP logo
    Thompson & Knight LLP
    Established in 1887, Thompson & Knight is a full-service law firm with more than 300 attorneys. The Firm provides legal solutions to clients and communities around the world and is particularly recognized for its depth of experience and capabilities on behalf of the energy industry. Thompson & Knight has been named “Law Firm of the Year” in Oil & Gas Law in U.S. News-Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” for 2011-2013 and 2015.
     
    tklaw.com
  • Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati logo
    Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
    Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is the premier legal advisor to technology, life sciences, and other growth enterprises worldwide. We represent companies at every stage of development, from entrepreneurial start-ups to multibillion-dollar global corporations, as well as the venture firms, private equity firms, and investment banks that finance and advise them. The firm's broad range of services and practice areas are focused on addressing the principal challenges faced by the management, boards of directors, shareholders, and in-house counsel of our clients.

    The firm is nationally recognized for providing high-quality services to address the legal solutions required by its enterprise and financial institution clients. Our services include corporate law and governance, public and private offerings of equity and debt securities, mergers and acquisitions, securities class action litigation, intellectual property litigation, antitrust counseling and litigation, joint ventures and strategic alliances, technology licensing and other intellectual property transactions, tax, and employee benefits and employment law, among other areas. Our distinguished international roster of clients span a wide variety of industries, including information technology, life sciences, energy and clean technology, media and entertainment, communications, retail, and financial services.
    wgsr.com
  • Winstead PC logo
    Winstead PC

    Winstead has a large national and global footprint in intellectual property, with highly competitive rates and the deep technical diversity to advise corporations, inventors and authors, start-ups, and research institutions and universities. Our IP lawyers and supporting team function as a nimble IP boutique practice, working equally well with—and at the pace of—entrepreneurs, corporate counsel and executives. With our large firm infrastructure, however, we can scale fast, and are able to quickly jump into huge litigation and large, tight-deadline prosecutions.  Winstead IP lawyers perfect, protect and commercialize our clients’ inventions, works of authorship, trademarks, trade secrets and know-how throughout the world.

     

    winstead.com
Download Sponsor Details Become a Sponsor
Become a Sponsor
Email UT Law CLE for more information on sponsoring an event.

Stay in the loop with UT Law CLE

Sign-Up Now  
Accredited CLE
Live Conferences
Studio Webcasts
eConferences
eCourses
Hooked on CLE
Answer Bar
Research & Self-Study
Materials
eLibrary

Subscriptions
MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
Your UT Law CLE
Your Briefcase
Your Account
Your Cart
Sign In or Join
About
Scholarships
Sponsorships
Speakers
Texas Law Resources
UT Law CLE
About Us
Our Volunteers
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Security
Help & Contact
FAQ
Contact Us
Facebook    LinkedIn    Twitter    Youtube

© 2024 The University of Texas School of Law Continuing Legal Education | 512.475.6700 | Version 8.037.2

Back to top
More Information
Warning
Error
Warning
Please sign in to continue
Forgot Password   |  Create Account
Item has been added to your cart.

Item description

Checkout
Item has been added to your Briefcase.

Item description

Go to your Briefcase