University of Texas Law logo Update your account
  • Sign in or Join Account and Briefcase
    Not a member yet? Sign up Forgot password?
  • Accredited CLE
    Live Conferences Studio Webcasts eConferences eCourses Hooked on CLE Answer Bar
  • Research & Self-Study
    Materials eLibrary
  • Subscriptions
    MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
  • Browse by Practice Area
    Administrative Admiralty and Maritime Alternative Dispute Resolution Appellate - Civil and Criminal Bankruptcy Business Entities Civil Rights Construction Corporate Counsel Criminal Cybersecurity Elder Law and Guardianship Employment Entertainment and Sports Law Environmental Essentials Ethics Exempt Organizations / Nonprofits Family Government Enforcement / White Collar Crime Healthcare Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property / Patent Law International Law Practice Management Litigation M&A and Securities Oil, Gas and Energy Practice Skills Real Estate Renewable Energy School Self-Care Taxation Technology Technology for Lawyers Trusts and Estates / Probate Water
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart

What are you searching for?

Skip to main content
UT Law CLE logo
  • Overview /
  • Schedule /
  • Faculty /
  • Credit Info /
  • Key Dates /
  • Sponsors
Register or Buy ticket icon Buy
Conference art

25th Annual

Advanced Patent Law Institute

Live Webcast Nov 5-6, 2020
Conference Concluded
Buy
Related products: eConference Materials
WEBCAST UNDERWRITER
Baker Botts L.L.P.

PREMIER SPONSORS
Duane Morris LLP
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Gray Reed 
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright 
Perkins Coie LLP

INSTITUTE SPONSORS
Conley Rose, P.C.
DuBois Bryant & Campbell
Duff & Phelps
Jones Day
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Ocean Tomo
Patent Designs
Thompson & Knight LLP
Brochure thumbnail
Download Brochure (PDF)

Overview

UT Law's 25th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute, now a Live Webcast, covers the latest developments in patent law and features a sophisticated array of prosecution and litigation topics. Hear from nationally recognized faculty including senior IP counsel of major corporations, patent prosecution and litigation experts from around the nation, U.S. District Court Judges, and leading academics. This year’s program features:
  • A look at how COVID-19 is impacting patent practice, including nuts and bolts for remote litigation.
  • A review of the year’s key Federal Circuit and Supreme Court cases by Mark A. Lemley.
  • The latest in Section 101 as well as practical prosecution strategies for software and life sciences.
  • An examination of global trends and enforcement, plus considerations for international patent prosecution.
  • Recent Developments in Claims Construction with Kenneth R. Adamo.
  • An overview of PTAB policy shifts in the last year, plus a discussion on PTAB practice strategies.
  • An exploration of the evolving guidance on AI claims and how they are being applied.
  • The popular U.S. District Court Judicial Panel.
  • An In-House Counsel panel and virtual “breakfast” presentation, hosted by Women in IP.
  • A full 15.00 hours, including 2.50 hours Ethics credit
Following the conference, attendees will receive a bonus eSupplement containing an additional 0.50 hour of Ethics credit to ensure practitioners can earn their required 15.00/3.00 Texas MCLE hours for the year.

If you cannot watch the entire 2-day webcast at its scheduled time, don’t worry!
Register now and view as much of the live webcast as your schedule allows. In addition, you will receive the recorded eConference in “Your Briefcase”, available 4-6 weeks after the live webcast, and can watch and claim credit (pre-approved in TX and CA) for any presentations you missed.

  • Buy

Event Schedule

Program is subject to change.
All times are Central Time Zone.

  • Day 1 November 5, 2020
  • Day 2 November 6, 2020
  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Thursday Morning, Nov. 5, 2020
    Presiding Officer:
    Hilda C. Galvan, Jones Day - Dallas, TX
  • 8:20 am
    Welcoming Remarks

  • 8:30 am
    0.75 hr
    Recent Developments in Claim Construction
    The baseline of patent application preparation/prosecution, district court trials, Federal Circuit appeals, and AIA post-grant review proceedings, is claim construction. Review the important 2019-2020 claim construction cases and issues at the Federal Circuit and trial court levels, as well as at the PTAB. Examine the PTAB’s procedural and substantive claim construction “rules, practices, and etc." And discuss adherence to the APA by the PTAB under various circumstances, plus rule and practice changes to mandate PTAB consideration of claim constructions from other proceedings.

    Kenneth R. Adamo, Law Office of KRAdamo - Chicago, IL

  • 9:15 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 9:20 am
    0.75 hr
    Antitrust 2020: Changing Politics, Technology and Problems Have Caused Upheaval! A Real-Time Presentation of Disruption in Antitrust and Competition Law
    Since the beginning of this year, there have been profound changes in the antitrust and competition landscape. New lawsuits are being filed and existing cases pressed hard despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology companies need to be aware of the storm now breaking over licensing for 5G in lawsuits pending in federal courts in Texas and Delaware. The 180 degree change at the Department of Justice that has the Antitrust Division actively litigating with non-practicing patent entities against companies that produce technology, software, semiconductors and telecom products. COVID-19 drove a dramatic to the ground rules and procedures for collaboration for companies that can provide essential technology, products and services. This real-time presentation illustrates what is happening right now and how it could impact you.

    Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey, Fish & Richardson P.C. - Houston, TX

  • 10:05 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 10:10 am
    0.75 hr
    Section 101 Update: Alice at Six
    Hear an update on this year’s patentable subject matter cases and other developments. What have we learned over the last six years and what can we expect moving forward? Plus, hear some suggested do’s and don’ts for prosecution and litigation.

    Steve Borgman, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP - Houston, TX
    Janice Le Ta, Perkins Coie LLP - Austin, TX
    Michael W. Piper, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX
    Gina N. Shishima, Norton Rose Fulbright - Austin, TX

  • 10:55 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 11:00 am
    0.75 hr
    Section 101 in Two Realms: Practical Tips for Addressing Ongoing Challenges in Getting Patents in the Life Sciences and in Software
    A year after the newest USPTO guidelines on patent eligibility, our panelists discuss prosecution suggestions in the software/business and the bio/pharma technical areas, in particular, our best pragmatic advice on managing your 101 challenges at USPTO and including a focus on patent applications concerning COVID-19 diagnostic tests, serology tests, vaccines, and therapeutics as examples for the pharma challenges and opportunities we are facing.

    Steve Borgman, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP - Houston, TX
    Michael W. Piper, Conley Rose, PC - Plano, TX
    Gina N. Shishima, Norton Rose Fulbright - Austin, TX

  • 11:45 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 11:50 am
    0.75 hr
    Increasing Innovation and Transforming Industries through Open Source
    Innovation is being democratized where users of products and services—both firms and individual consumers—are increasingly able to innovate for themselves. They’re building open source into the fabric of their R&D and development models, bringing speed to innovation that collaborating in open source enables. Users that innovate can develop exactly what they want, rather than relying on manufacturers to act as their agents. What is the place of patents and how are they affected by such innovation?

    Karen F. Copenhaver, The Linux Foundation - Boston, MA
    Umesh M. Desai, AT&T Labs - Austin, TX

  • 12:35 pm
    Break for Lunch—Presentation Resumes at 1:00 p.m.

  • Thursday Afternoon, Nov. 5, 2020
    Presiding Officer:
    Richard L. Wynne Jr., Thompson & Knight LLP - Dallas, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • 1:00 pm
    1.00 hr
    0.25 hr ethics
    The COVID-19 Effect on the Practice of Patent Law
    Explore the practical and procedural effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of patent law from the perspective of litigation, patent prosecution, working from home, and in-house management.

    Moderator:
    Ozz Siddiq, Lennox International - Richardson, TX
    Panelists:
    Shannon W. Bates, Harper Bates & Champion LLP - Dallas, TX
    Tara L. Clothier, Essilor of America, Inc. - Dallas, TX
    José C. Villarreal, Perkins Coie LLP - Austin, TX

  • 2:00 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 2:05 pm
    0.50 hr
    PTAB Policy Shifts
    The Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Iancu administration continue to push the evolution of the PTAB. This presentation covers fast-moving highlights of where we are and where we may be going. Change is certain.

    Teresa Stanek Rea, Crowell & Moring, LLP - Washington, DC

  • 2:35 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 2:40 pm
    1.00 hr
    PTAB Practice Strategies
    Discuss new developments impacting practice before the Board, including evolving standards on the PTAB's exercise of discretion, timing of parallel litigation, pressure on litigants, and more.

    Moderator:
    David W. O'Brien, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Austin, TX
    Panelists:
    Scott A. McKeown, Ropes & Gray LLP - Washington, DC
    Emily R. Whelan, Wilmer Hale - Boston, MA

  • 3:40 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 3:45 pm
    0.75 hr
    0.50 hr ethics
    Privilege Issues and Discoverability of Agreements
    With the explosive growth of litigation funding, parties (and funders) face challenging issues related to the discoverability of funding agreements and engagement agreements. This presentation explores the relevance of such agreements and whether they are protected by attorney-client privilege, work product, common interest, or otherwise.

    Kevin Kudlac, Connor Kudlac Lee, PLLC - Austin, TX

  • 4:30 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 4:35 pm
    1.00 hr
    0.50 hr ethics
    Judicial Panel
    Hear distinguished judges from the District Courts discuss their experiences hearing and trying patent cases.

    Moderator:
    Hilda C. Galvan, Jones Day - Dallas, TX
    Panelists:
    Hon. Alan D Albright, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas - Waco, TX
    Hon. Sean D. Jordan, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Plano, TX
    Hon. Maryellen Noreika, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware - Wilmington, DE

  • 5:35 pm
    Adjourn

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Friday Morning, Nov. 6, 2020
    Presiding Officer:
    Betty Ellsworth Ungerman, Lennox International Inc. - Richardson, TX
  • 8:00 am
    1.00 hr
    0.50 hr ethics
    Women in IP Breakfast Panel: Challenges and Current Issues Facing In-House Counsel

    Moderator:
    Ann LaFeir, USAA - San Antonio, TX
    Panelists:
    Brianna Hinojosa-Smith, Yum! Brands, Inc. - Plano, TX
    Irene Kosturakis, BMC Software, Inc. - Houston, TX
    Keith E. Witek, Google, Inc. - Mountain View, CA

  • 9:00 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 9:05 am
    1.00 hr
    Year in Review: Federal Circuit and SCOTUS Update
    A whirlwind summary of the most important developments in Supreme Court and Federal Circuit case law over the last year.

    Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP - Stanford and San Francisco, CA

  • 10:05 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 10:10 am
    0.50 hr
    The Appointments Clause, Severability, and Forfeiture in Arthrex
    The Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (2019), purported to save the power of the USPTO’s administrative patent judges to conduct inter partes review by abrogating for-cause removal protection for those judges. This presentation examines the Appointments Clause concerns that motivated that abrogation, whether severing the for-cause removal protection was a proper response, and whether the Appointments Clause challenge should have been considered forfeit as not raised before the USPTO.

    John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law - Austin, TX

  • 10:40 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 10:45 am
    0.75 hr
    Worldwide Patent Litigation Trends
    A look at litigation trends and practices in multiple international jurisdictions.

    Moderator:
    Kat Li, McKool Smith - Austin, TX
    Panelists:
    Klaus Haft, HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER Europe LLP - Düsseldorf, Germany
    He Jing, GEN Law - Beijing, China

  • 11:30 am
    5-Minute Break

  • 11:35 am
    0.75 hr
    International Prosecution
    Hear tips on how to prepare for a global filing and examine issues and considerations in different jurisdictions, with a special emphasis on European patents and China.

    Jimmy Chen, IBM China Co. Ltd - Beijing, China
    Tim Graham, IBM UK Ltd - Winchester, United Kingdom

  • 12:20 pm
    Break for Lunch—Presentation Resumes at 12:45 p.m.

  • Friday Afternoon, Nov. 6, 2020
    Presiding Officer:
    William D. Wiese, DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P. - Austin, TX
  • LUNCHEON PRESENTATION
  • 12:45 pm
    0.75 hr
    Nuts and Bolts of Remote Litigation
    A discussion of various aspects of litigating patent disputes remotely, including best practices for handling remote hearings, depositions, and even trials.

    Bert A. Greene, Duane Morris LLP - Austin, TX
    Matthew S. Yungwirth, Duane Morris LLP - Atlanta, GA

  • 1:30 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 1:35 pm
    0.75 hr
    ​Damages: FRAND, Foreign Activity, and Other Recent Developments
    A discussion of recent developments in patent damages, including recent decisions affecting FRAND licensing and damages, pursuing damages for foreign activity in U.S. courts, and the impact of COVID-19 on the calculation and presentation of damages claims.

    Moderator:
    Shirley Webster, Ocean Tomo, LLC - Houston, TX
    Panelists:
    Anne M. Cappella, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP - Silicon Valley, CA
    Garland T. Stephens, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP - Houston, TX

  • 2:20 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 2:25 pm
    0.75 hr
    AI Claims
    Examine new rules on AI claims, including evolving guidance from the USPTO, and how those rules will be applied.

    Robert Bahr, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
    Matt Osterhaus, Fletcher Yoder, P.C. - Houston, TX

  • 3:10 pm
    5-Minute Break

  • 3:15 pm
    0.75 hr ethics
    The Ins and Outs of Conflicts of Interest
    This session covers conflicts of interest when lawyers migrate from one law firm, or legal department, to another and recent cases addressing disqualification motions.

    David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP - Macon and Atlanta, GA

  • 4:00 pm
    Adjourn

  • Day 1 November 5, 2020
  • Day 2 November 6, 2020
Download Schedule

Conference Faculty

Kenneth R. Adamo

Law Office of KRAdamo
Chicago, IL

Hon. Alan D Albright

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Waco, TX

Robert Bahr

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Shannon W. Bates

Harper Bates & Champion LLP
Dallas, TX

Steve Borgman

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Houston, TX

Anne M. Cappella

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Silicon Valley, CA

Jimmy Chen

IBM China Co. Ltd
Beijing, China

Tara L. Clothier

Essilor of America, Inc.
Dallas, TX

Karen F. Copenhaver

The Linux Foundation
Boston, MA

Umesh M. Desai

AT&T Labs
Austin, TX

Hilda C. Galvan

Jones Day
Dallas, TX

John M. Golden

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Tim Graham

IBM UK Ltd
Winchester, United Kingdom

Bert A. Greene

Duane Morris LLP
Austin, TX

Klaus Haft

HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER Europe LLP
Düsseldorf, Germany

Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

Brianna Hinojosa-Smith

Yum! Brands, Inc.
Plano, TX

David Hricik

Mercer University School of Law and Taylor English Duma LLP
Macon and Atlanta, GA

He Jing

GEN Law
Beijing, China

Hon. Sean D. Jordan

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Plano, TX

Irene Kosturakis

BMC Software, Inc.
Houston, TX

Kevin Kudlac

Connor Kudlac Lee, PLLC
Austin, TX

Ann LaFeir

USAA
San Antonio, TX

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

Kat Li

McKool Smith
Austin, TX

Scott A. McKeown

Ropes & Gray LLP
Washington, DC

Hon. Maryellen Noreika

U.S. District Court, District of Delaware
Wilmington, DE

David W. O'Brien

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX

Matt Osterhaus

Fletcher Yoder, P.C.
Houston, TX

Michael W. Piper

Conley Rose, PC
Plano, TX

Teresa Stanek Rea

Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC

Gina N. Shishima

Norton Rose Fulbright
Austin, TX

Ozz Siddiq

Lennox International
Richardson, TX

Garland T. Stephens

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Houston, TX

Janice Le Ta

Perkins Coie LLP
Austin, TX

José C. Villarreal

Perkins Coie LLP
Austin, TX

Shirley Webster

Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX

Emily R. Whelan

Wilmer Hale
Boston, MA

Keith E. Witek

Google, Inc.
Mountain View, CA

Matthew S. Yungwirth

Duane Morris LLP
Atlanta, GA

Planning Committee

Hilda C. Galvan—Co-Chair

Jones Day
Dallas, TX

Betty Ellsworth Ungerman—Co-Chair

Lennox International Inc.
Richardson, TX

Joanna Jefferson—Director

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Michael P. Adams

Dykema
Austin, TX

Tom Adolph

Adolph Locklar
Houston, TX

Hon. Alan D Albright

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
Waco, TX

Michael C. Barrett

Cirrus Logic, Inc.
Austin, TX

Steve Borgman

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Houston, TX

Christa Brown-Sanford

Baker Botts
Dallas, TX

Tamara Copeland

Duff and Phelps, LLC
Houston, TX

Umesh M. Desai

AT&T Labs
Austin, TX

David George Dolezal

NXP Semiconductors
Austin, TX

Elisabeth Evert

Hitchcock Evert LLP
Dallas, TX

Heather L. Flanagan PhD

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Austin, TX

John D. Flynn

IBM Corporation
Austin, TX

Mark Thomas Garrett

Norton Rose Fulbright
Austin, TX

Ross Spencer Garsson

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Austin, TX

John M. Golden

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Bert A. Greene

Duane Morris LLP
Austin, TX

John M. Guaragna

DLA Piper LLP US
Austin, TX

Danielle Joy "DJ" Healey

Fish & Richardson P.C.
Houston, TX

David G. Henry

Gray Reed & McGraw, P.C.
Houston, TX

Brianna Hinojosa-Smith

Yum! Brands, Inc.
Plano, TX

Kevin Kudlac

Connor Kudlac Lee, PLLC
Austin, TX

Ann LaFeir

USAA
San Antonio, TX

William L. LaFuze

McKool Smith
Houston, TX

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School and Durie Tangri LLP
Stanford and San Francisco, CA

David L. McCombs

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX

Kevin J. Meek

Baker Botts
Austin, TX

Dean M. Munyon

Meyertons, Hood, Kivlin, Kowert & Goetzel, P.C.
West Lake Hills, TX

Eric L. Natinsky

Quick Technologies Inc.
Austin, TX

David W. O'Brien

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Austin, TX

Mark E. Patrick

Texas Instruments Incorporated
Dallas, TX

Anthony E. Peterman

Dell
Round Rock, TX

Brian Peterman

Silicon Labs
Austin, TX

Garland T. Stephens

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Houston, TX

José C. Villarreal

Perkins Coie LLP
Austin, TX

Kim M. Vo

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Austin, TX

Shirley Webster

Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX

William D. Wiese

DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, L.L.P.
Austin, TX

Douglas Wilson

Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP
Austin, TX

Keith E. Witek

Google, Inc.
Mountain View, CA

James D. Woods

Economic Analytics Consulting, LLC
Houston, TX

Richard L. Wynne Jr.

Thompson & Knight LLP
Dallas, TX

Credit Info

  • Live Webcast
MCLE Credit
Toggle view Texas – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
You may claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas.  A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit. The system reports Texas CLE credit every Tuesday. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com, using the course number  provided on your certificate of attendance.
Toggle view California – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
To claim California MCLE credit, California credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE is required to provide the State Bar with electronic attendance records for any MCLE participatory activity within 60 days of completion of the activity. The California licensee is responsible for reporting their compliance/credit hours earned to the State Bar at the end of their reporting period directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov.  UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Illinois – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
To claim Illinois MCLE credit, Illinois credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Within 10 days of the conference you must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, then you will be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Failure to submit your credit within 10 days may result in attendance not being reported or may result in additional fees being assessed to you for credit reporting. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view New Jersey – 18.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim New Jersey MCLE credit, New Jersey credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. At the conclusion of the conference you will need to claim and certify your credit online, in your UTCLE "Briefcase". Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years. Self-report your credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on CLE.

As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations (PDF).

New Jersey MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

 
Toggle view New York – 18.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim New York MCLE credit, New York credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.   

As The University of Texas School of Law is a Oklahoma Bar Association presumptively approved MCLE provider (#169), and Oklahoma is a New York Approved Jurisdiction on List A, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines (PDF).

Upon claiming and certifying your credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the New York State CLE Board.

New York MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
 
Toggle view Ohio – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
To claim Ohio MCLE credit, Ohio credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

You must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to The Supreme Court of Ohio within 30 days after the conference. 

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Oklahoma – 18.00 hrs  |  3.00 hrs Ethics
To claim Oklahoma MCLE credit, Oklahoma credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #169) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Oklahoma Bar Association for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the webcast.
Toggle view Pennsylvania – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
To claim Pennsylvania MCLE credit, Pennsylvania credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

UT Law CLE is an approved provider of Pennsylvania credit, sponsor #236. Attorney attendance will be reported to Pennsylvania within 2 weeks after credit is claimed and submitted. Attorneys are not able to report this credit on their own, and UT Law CLE pays all associated fees for the credit hours. Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Other States – 15.00 hrs  |  2.50 hrs Ethics
Note on Self-Reporting Your Credits in Another State
If you wish to satisfy MCLE or other professional education requirements in another state for a program offered by the University of Texas School of Law, please check with the state bar or other licensing authority in that state to ensure it will qualify for self-reporting your credits.
 
To claim Other States MCLE credit, Other States credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. You must claim and  certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records and to provide to other licensing authorities as needed. 

This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Other Credit
Toggle view TX Accounting CPE – 18.00 hrs
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Texas Accounting CPE credit, the Texas Accounting CPE credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your CPE credit directly to the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.

Key Dates

Live Webcast – Nov 5-6, 2020
Conference Concluded
Buy
  • Live Webcast
Individual
Last day for $695.00 Regular pricing: Nov 5, 2020

$695.00 for registrations received after this time

In-House Counsel
Last day for $495.00 Regular pricing: Nov 5, 2020

$495.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (5 registrants minimum)
Last day for $625.00 Regular pricing: Nov 5, 2020

$625.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (10 registrants minimum)
Last day for $555.00 Regular pricing: Nov 5, 2020

$555.00 for registrations received after this time

Last day for cancellation (full refund): Oct 30, 2020

$50 processing fee applied after this date

Last day for cancellation: Nov 2, 2020

Our Sponsors

Thank you to our sponsors! Click each logo below to learn more.

  • Baker Botts L.L.P. logo
    Baker Botts L.L.P.
    Baker Botts has one of the largest, most highly-qualified IP practice of any full-service firm. Our 190 IP lawyers and professionals hold more than 240 technical degrees in technical fields across all disciplines. Our IP practice spans district court, appellate, and agency litigation as well as prosecution, licensing, and other transactional work. Based on our experience and knowledge of our clients’ industries, we are recognized as a leading firm in the technology, life sciences, and energy sectors. For more information, please visit bakerbotts.com.
    www.bakerbotts.com
  • Duane Morris LLP logo
    Duane Morris LLP
    Duane Morris LLP, a law firm with more than 800 attorneys in offices across the United States and internationally, provides innovative solutions to today’s legal and business challenges to a broad array of clients. Throughout its more than 100-year history, Duane Morris has fostered a collegial culture, where lawyers collaborate to leverage our collective knowledge and experience. Our lawyers are leaders in a wide range of legal disciplines and are as diverse as the clients they serve. duanemorris.com/
  • Fish & Richardson P.C. logo
    Fish & Richardson P.C.
    Fish & Richardson is a global intellectual property law firm offering patent, trademark and copyright prosecution and counseling, intellectual property litigation, and commercial litigation services. The firm has more than 400 attorneys and technology specialists in the U.S. and Europe. Our success is rooted in our creative and inclusive culture, which values the diversity of people, experiences, and perspectives. Fish is the No. 1 U.S. patent litigation firm, handling nearly three times as many cases as its nearest competitor; a powerhouse patent and trademark prosecution firm; a top-tier trademark and copyright litigation firm; and the No. 1 firm at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, with more cases than any other firm. Since 1878, Fish attorneys have been winning cases worth billions in controversy – often by making new law – for the world’s most innovative and influential technology leaders. For more information, visit https://www.fr.com or follow us at @FishRichardson
    fr.com
  • Gray Reed logo
    Gray Reed
     A full-service Texas law firm of more than 150 attorneys with offices in Dallas, Houston and Waco, Gray Reed provides legal services to companies ranging from start-up to Fortune 100 as well as high net worth individuals. Gray Reed attorneys assist clients with a myriad of legal issues including commercial litigation, corporate transactions, oil and gas, tax planning and litigation, real estate, construction, banking and finance, healthcare, trusts and estates, employment law, family law, intellectual property and bankruptcy. For more information, visit www.grayreed.com.
  • Haynes and Boone, LLP logo
    Haynes and Boone, LLP
    Haynes and Boone is an international corporate law firm with offices in Texas, New York, California, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Washington, D.C., London, Mexico City and Shanghai, providing a full spectrum of legal services in energy, technology, financial services and private equity. With more than 575 lawyers, Haynes and Boone is ranked among the largest U.S.-based firms by The National Law Journal, The American Lawyer and The Lawyer. It also was recognized across the board for excellence in the BTI Consulting Group’s 2020 “A-Team” report, which identifies the law firms that in-house counsel commend for providing superior client service.
    www.haynesboone.com
  • Norton Rose Fulbright logo
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice with approximately 4,000 lawyers based in more than 50 offices worldwide, providing the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. With more than 250 lawyers, patent attorneys and trademark agents across five continents, our global intellectual property team has extensive experience providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary IP law services to clients. Our  team has experience that spans the spectrum of issues that are crucial to companies that rely on IP assets for their success, including: obtaining, enforcing and licensing patents, trademarks and copyrights; litigating infringement claims; developing proactive enforcement strategies to protect IP; and auditing and assessing IP assets. Our lawyers are skilled at analyzing a company’s IP and developing strategic methods to protect it; as a result, businesses around the world choose us as their IP counsel. Many of our professionals hold scientific degrees, including masters and Ph.D.s, to complement their practical experience and combine deep industry and technical knowledge with broad legal understanding. 
    nortonrosefulbright.com
  • Perkins Coie LLP logo
    Perkins Coie LLP
    Perkins Coie is a leading international law firm that is known for providing high value, strategic solutions and extraordinary client service on matters vital to our clients’ success. With more than 1,100 lawyers in offices across the United States and Asia, we provide a full array of corporate, commercial litigation, intellectual property and regulatory legal advice to a broad range of clients, including many of the world’s most innovative companies and industry leaders as well as public and not-for-profit organizations. perkinscoie.com
  • Conley Rose, P.C. logo
    Conley Rose, P.C.
    Conley Rose is a Texas-based intellectual property firm offering a complete range of services for technology-driven companies and entrepreneurs. Our clients’ needs for sophisticated intellectual property services have enabled us to grow to a firm of about forty IP-focused professionals servicing clients worldwide from our offices in Houston and Dallas. For more than 25 years, Conley Rose has prepared, procured and maintained patents, trademarks, and copyrights, and it has continued to both enforce clients’ intellectual property rights against infringers and defend its clients against claims of infringement. Conley Rose also has a robust transactional practice, including the drafting and negotiation of intellectual property transfer, license, and development agreements, as well as preparing and providing portfolio analyses, legal opinions, due diligence review and counseling.
     
    www.conleyrose.com/
  • DuBois Bryant & Campbell logo
    DuBois Bryant & Campbell
    DuBois, Bryant & Campbell is an Austin, Texas based law firm dedicated to providing top quality legal services to a broad range of clients. Clients across Texas have relied on DuBois Bryant & Campbell’s in-depth expertise and experience across a diverse range of practice areas, from intellectual property protection to complex commercial transactions.
    dbcllp.com/
  • Duff & Phelps logo
    Duff & Phelps
    Duff & Phelps is the world’s premier provider of governance, risk and transparency solutions. We work with clients across diverse sectors in the areas of valuation, corporate finance, disputes and investigations, cyber security, claims administration and regulatory compliance. With Kroll, the leading global provider of risk solutions, and Prime Clerk, the leader in complex business services and claims administration, our firm has nearly 4,000 professionals in 25 countries around the world.  Duff & Phelps’ Intellectual Property Disputes practice provides independent expert analyses and consulting services to clients involved in complex IP disputes. Our team of economic, financial and accounting experts have significant experience in calculating and analyzing damages relating to: infringement of patents, trademarks, trade names, and copyrights; misappropriation of trade secrets; and license and valuation disputes. Our team adds value through all phases of litigation, including preliminary case assessment, expert reports, deposition and trial testimony, and post-verdict damages and impact analysis.
    www.duffandphelps.com/
  • Jones Day logo
    Jones Day
    Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers in 43 offices across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by: a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs. We are One Firm Worldwide. jonesday.com
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP logo
    Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
    For more than 150 years, Kilpatrick Townsend has contributed to the success of leading businesses and brands around the world by delivering expert legal guidance in intellectual property, litigation and corporate transactional matters. We help our clients to create, expand and protect the value of their companies and most prized assets by applying an equal balance of business acumen, technical skill, and creative thinking to the opportunities and challenges they face. We are dedicated to the constant pursuit of our clients’ successes, taking time to understand their businesses and to work collaboratively with them to achieve their goals. By investing in their achievements, we help clients make their businesses better, smarter and more competitive. Our intellectual property practice is comprised of more than 300 attorneys dedicated to patent, trademark, copyright, advertising, and/or trade secrets law, featuring all the expertise of a self-sufficient  practice backed by the resources and business acumen of a full-service law firm. For more information about our Firm, our U.S. and international offices as well as our Houston and Dallas, Texas offices, please visit us online at www.kilpatricktownsend.com. kilpatricktownsend.com/
  • Ocean Tomo logo
    Ocean Tomo
     
    Established in 2003, Ocean Tomo, LLC, is the Intellectual Capital Merchant Banc™ firm providing Opinion, Management and Advisory services centered on intellectual property assets. Ocean Tomo assists clients—corporations, law firms, governments and institutional investors—in realizing Intellectual Capital Equity® value broadly defined. Practice offerings address financial expert testimony, intellectual property and complex financial instrument valuation, strategy consulting, investment services, risk and regulatory compliance, transaction advisory and brokerage. Our comprehensive suite of products and services is built upon more than two decades of experience valuing intellectual property in the most rigorous of venues—Federal, State and international courts. Our financial, market and technical experts provide a unique understanding of the contributory value of proprietary innovation. This is the cornerstone of our business. This insight permeates every practice.
     
    www.oceantomo.com/
  • Patent Designs logo
    Patent Designs
    Patent Designs is an illustration company offering utility, design, trade dress and trademark drawing services. The company has been a part of the IP industry for over 25 years, and in that time has assembled a dedicated team of Coordinators, Drafters and Checkers. Our team quickly and consistently produces drawings that comply with rigorous internal standards, as well as those established by the USPTO. One unique aspect of working with Patent Designs, and part of our success, is that there are no extra charges for overnight, rush, or same-day projects. Our teams are standing by to receive drafting requests and work diligently to complete projects on or before client deadlines. Patent Designs understands that in the world of IP time equals money, therefore we are constantly striving to educate our team members on how to be more efficient as well as offering opportunities for practitioners to learn how to better communicate with drafting services. Our commitment is to delivering the highest quality product. patentdesigns.net
  • Thompson & Knight LLP logo
    Thompson & Knight LLP
    Established in Dallas in 1887, Thompson & Knight has been at the forefront of groundbreaking litigation and transactions throughout Texas and the Southwest. Our Intellectual Property and Innovation attorneys focus on patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, unfair competition, and related technology matters; we received a top national ranking for Intellectual Property Litigation in U.S. News-Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” 2019 and are regularly recognized by IAM Patent 1000 and World Trademark Review among the top firms in Texas. For more information, visit www.tklaw.com.
    www.tklaw.com/
Download Sponsor Details Become a Sponsor
Become a Sponsor
Email UT Law CLE for more information on sponsoring an event.

Stay in the loop with UT Law CLE

Sign-Up Now  
Accredited CLE
Live Conferences
Studio Webcasts
eConferences
eCourses
Hooked on CLE
Answer Bar
Research & Self-Study
Materials
eLibrary

Subscriptions
MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
Your UT Law CLE
Your Briefcase
Your Account
Your Cart
Sign In or Join
About
Scholarships
Sponsorships
Speakers
Texas Law Resources
UT Law CLE
About Us
Our Volunteers
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Security
Help & Contact
FAQ
Contact Us
Facebook    LinkedIn    Twitter    Youtube

© 2024 The University of Texas School of Law Continuing Legal Education | 512.475.6700 | Version 9.001.3

Back to top
More Information
Warning
Error
Warning
Please sign in to continue
Forgot Password   |  Create Account
Item has been added to your cart.

Item description

Checkout
Item has been added to your Briefcase.

Item description

Go to your Briefcase