University of Texas Law logo Update your account
  • Sign in or Join Account and Briefcase
    Not a member yet? Sign up Forgot password?
  • Accredited CLE
    Live Conferences Studio Webcasts eConferences eCourses Hooked on CLE Answer Bar
  • Research & Self-Study
    Materials eLibrary
  • Subscriptions
    MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
  • Browse by Practice Area
    Administrative Admiralty and Maritime Alternative Dispute Resolution Appellate - Civil and Criminal Bankruptcy Business Entities Civil Rights Construction Corporate Counsel Criminal Cybersecurity Elder Law and Guardianship Employment Entertainment and Sports Law Environmental Essentials Ethics Exempt Organizations / Nonprofits Family Government Enforcement / White Collar Crime Healthcare Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property / Patent Law International Law Practice Management Litigation M&A and Securities Oil, Gas and Energy Practice Skills Real Estate Renewable Energy School Self-Care Taxation Technology Technology for Lawyers Trusts and Estates / Probate Water
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart

What are you searching for?

Skip to main content
UT Law CLE logo
  • Overview /
  • Schedule /
  • Faculty /
  • Credit Info /
  • Key Dates /
  • Sponsors
Register or Buy ticket icon Buy
Conference art

16th Annual

Advanced Patent Law Institute

PRESENTED BY
The University of Texas School of Law
The George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School
Live Webcast Mar 23-25, 2021
Conference Concluded
Buy
Related products: eConference Materials
PREMIER SPONSOR
Chamberlain Hrdlicka

INSTITUTE SPONSOR
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Brochure thumbnail
Download Brochure (PDF)

Overview

The 16th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute is coming to you virtually this year! While we will miss being at the United States Patent and Trademark Office this spring, we've developed this year's program to make the most of your experience with us online. Spanning three afternoons, the program continues to offer a unique opportunity to hear from USPTO senior staff, leading practitioners, academics, and members of the federal judiciary on the latest developments in patent law. 

  • Buy

Event Schedule

Program is subject to change.
All times are Central Time Zone.

  • Day 1 March 23, 2021
  • Day 2 March 24, 2021
  • Day 3 March 25, 2021
  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Tuesday Afternoon, Mar. 23, 2021
    Presiding Officer:
    J. Devlin Hartline, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University - Arlington, VA
  • All Times Listed are in CENTRAL Time.

  • 11:50 am
    Welcoming Remarks

  • 12:00 pm
    0.50 hr
    Opening Keynote: Update from the USPTO
    Hear about the current priorities, programs, and initiatives underway at the Office.

    Drew Hirshfeld, Commissioner for Patents, Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 12:30 pm
    Break

  • 12:40 pm
    0.75 hr
    Section 101: Impacts of the New Guidelines on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility and Federal Circuit Decisions
    Hear a brief overview of the PEG for subject matter eligibility and its impact on patent application allowance rates and PTAB affirmance rates. Plus, examine the various types of deference, if any, given by the Federal Circuit to the USPTO’s PEG, as well as patentability decisions and practice tips.

    Stephen G. Kunin, Maier & Maier PLLC - Alexandria, VA
    Andrew A. Toole, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 1:25 pm
    Break

  • 1:35 pm
    0.75 hr
    Written Description Requirements and Section 112(f)
    For years, the law involving means-plus-function clauses under Section 112(f) was quiescent and stable. But Examiners have been construing claim elements under Section 112(f) and applying the law of Section 112(f) - BOTH in high tech AND life sciences. Hear discussion on the potential pitfalls and practical solutions for drafting claims and specifications.

    Dale S. Lazar, Antonin Scalia Law School George Mason University - Arlington, VA
    Nicole Woods, Eli Lilly and Company - Somerville, NJ

  • 2:20 pm
    Break

  • 2:30 pm
    1.00 hr
    Issues of Preparing and Prosecuting AI-Based Applications
    Despite AI becoming more ubiquitous, underscoring innovation in all fields of technology, the path to patentability for AI-based inventions is still in flux. Representatives of both the USPTO and the EPO provide their insight and outlook regarding trends, best practices, and common issues in AI patenting.

    Moderator:
    Michelle K. Holoubek, Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox - Washington, DC
    Panelists:
    Robert Bahr, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
    Pia Björk, European Patent Office - Munich, Germany

  • 3:30 pm
    Break

  • 3:40 pm
    0.75 hr
    China Patent Update: Prior Art Explosion, Rapid Evolution of the CNIPA and Courts, and Filing and Prosecution Issues
    China has accomplished a massive evolution of its patent system in the last decade, with enormous increase in filings, rapid evolution of the CNIPA and patent-focused courts, and integration of its patent system into an ambitious global innovation agenda. This warrants understanding in order to effectively deal with the rapidly evolving global IP ecosystem.

    Moderator:
    Robert Greene Sterne, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - Washington, DC
    Panelists:
    Mark Cohen, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology - Berkeley, CA
    Richard Seidel, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 4:25 pm
    Adjourn

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Wednesday Afternoon, Mar. 24, 2021
    Presiding Officer:
    Karin Ferriter, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
  • 12:00 pm
    0.75 hr
    The USPTO & COVID-19 – Innovation through Adversity
    Learn more about the high-level filing trends in various COVID-19 related technological fields; plus hear an overview of the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) System, as it relates to these technologies.

    Antoinette F. Konski, Foley & Lardner LLP - Palo Alto, CA
    Jerry Lorengo, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 12:45 pm
    Break

  • 12:55 pm
    0.50 hr
    License Agreements: Hot Topics
    A discussion of the Rule 56 implications of Immunex Corp. v. Sandoz Inc. when licensing patent rights, and an overview of compulsory licensing and government march-in rights during a pandemic.

    Jeffrey A. Wolfson, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Washington, DC

  • 1:25 pm
    Break

  • 1:35 pm
    0.50 hr
    How to Think Like an Examiner

    Eddie Lefkowitz, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 2:05 pm
    Break

  • 2:15 pm
    0.50 hr
    AI Tools for Patents at the USPTO
    The USPTO Strategic Plan (2018-2022) emphasizes the development and delivery of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within our information technology tools for users of the patent system. Explore the AI-based solutions under development at the USPTO for patent search and patent classification.

    Matthew Such, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 2:45 pm
    Break

  • 2:55 pm
    1.00 hr ethics
    Professional Responsibility and Practice Before the USPTO
    Examine the ethics rules issued by the USPTO and how they are applied and enforced by today’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline, including ethics scenarios and applicable case law. Plus, explore current developments overseen by the OED, including current cases and the Diversion Pilot Program as well as USPTO pro bono programs.

    Tim Rooney, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 3:55 pm
    Adjourn

  • Time
    Credit
    Subject
    Speaker
  • Thursday Afternoon, Mar. 25, 2021
    Presiding Officer:
    William LaMarca, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
  • 12:00 pm
    0.50 hr
    PTAB Update
    Hear an update from the Chief Judge on recent trends and developments in PTAB appeal and trial proceedings.

    Hon. Scott R. Boalick, Chief Judge, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 12:30 pm
    Break

  • 12:40 pm
    1.00 hr
    Practice and Issues Before the PTAB
    Discuss changes to the PTAB with the advent of the new administration, including the latest developments with discretionary denials of institution and which party has the burden on a particular issue. Plus, explore any new decisions by the courts as to whether protective orders will prevent litigation counsel from also acting as IPR counsel. 

    Moderator:
    Teresa Stanek Rea, Crowell & Moring, LLP - Washington, DC
    Panelists:
    Hon. Linda E. Horner, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
    Joe Matal, Haynes and Boone, LLP - Washington, DC
    Hon. Michael Tierney, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA

  • 1:40 pm
    Break

  • 1:50 pm
    0.75 hr
    Best Practices for Ex Parte Appeals
    Learn what’s new in ex parte appeals, including current average appeal timelines and the new option to expedite frames, the LEAP program to promote and encourage oral argument by less experienced practitioners, and practice tips from both sides of the bench.

    Hon. Ken Barrett, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Alexandria, VA
    Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff, Foley & Lardner LLP - Washington, DC

  • 2:35 pm
    Break

  • 2:45 pm
    0.50 hr
    Arthrex: Where Are We Now?
    In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., the Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of the PTAB, and whether the APJs in the PTAB are principal officers who must be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. If they are, their appointment by the Director of the USPTO is unconstitutional and the Supreme Court will decide if the Federal Circuit properly remedied this constitutional defect by severing the APJ job-security protections, and thereby converting them into inferior officers. Explore this case and the oral argument, which is being held on March 1.

    Adam Mossoff, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University - Arlington, VA

  • 3:15 pm
    Break

  • 3:25 pm
    1.00 hr
    Federal Circuit Judicial Panel
    Hear from a panel of judges from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as they discuss their experiences hearing and trying patent cases.

    Moderator:
    Hon. Paul R. Michel, Chief Judge, Retired, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Washington, DC
    Panelists:
    Hon. Pauline Newman, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Washington, DC
    Hon. Kathleen M. O'Malley, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Washington, DC

  • 4:25 pm
    Adjourn

  • Day 1 March 23, 2021
  • Day 2 March 24, 2021
  • Day 3 March 25, 2021
Download Schedule

Conference Faculty

Robert Bahr

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Hon. Ken Barrett

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Pia Björk

European Patent Office
Munich, Germany

Hon. Scott R. Boalick

Chief Judge, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP
Washington, DC

Mark Cohen

Berkeley Center for Law & Technology
Berkeley, CA

Drew Hirshfeld

Commissioner for Patents, Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Michelle K. Holoubek

Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox
Washington, DC

Hon. Linda E. Horner

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Antoinette F. Konski

Foley & Lardner LLP
Palo Alto, CA

Stephen G. Kunin

Maier & Maier PLLC
Alexandria, VA

Dale S. Lazar

Antonin Scalia Law School George Mason University
Arlington, VA

Eddie Lefkowitz

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Jerry Lorengo

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Joe Matal

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Washington, DC

Hon. Paul R. Michel

Chief Judge, Retired, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Washington, DC

Adam Mossoff

Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
Arlington, VA

Hon. Pauline Newman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Washington, DC

Hon. Kathleen M. O'Malley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Washington, DC

Teresa Stanek Rea

Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC

Tim Rooney

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Richard Seidel

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Robert Greene Sterne

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC

Matthew Such

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Hon. Michael Tierney

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Andrew A. Toole

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Jeffrey A. Wolfson

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Washington, DC

Nicole Woods

Eli Lilly and Company
Somerville, NJ

Planning Committee

Hon. Georgianna Braden

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
North Richland Hills, TX

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP
Washington, DC

Karin Ferriter

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Joanna Jefferson

The University of Texas School of Law
Austin, TX

Stephen G. Kunin

Maier & Maier PLLC
Alexandria, VA

William L. LaFuze

McKool Smith
Houston, TX

William LaMarca

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Dale S. Lazar

Antonin Scalia Law School George Mason University
Arlington, VA

David L. McCombs

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Dallas, TX

Adam Mossoff

Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
Arlington, VA

Andrew Nalven

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Alexandria, VA

Teresa Stanek Rea

Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC

Whitney Remily

Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Falls Church, VA

John W. Ryan

Owens & Minor
Mechanicsville, VA

Robert Greene Sterne

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Washington, DC

Shirley Webster

Ocean Tomo, LLC
Houston, TX

Jeffrey A. Wolfson

Haynes and Boone, LLP
Washington, DC

Credit Info

  • Live Webcast
MCLE Credit
Toggle view Texas – 10.75 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
You may claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the State Bar of Texas.  A Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you upon claiming credit. The system reports Texas CLE credit every Tuesday. If you are claiming credit in the last week of your birth month, self-report your CLE credit directly to the State Bar of Texas at texasbar.com, using the course number  provided on your certificate of attendance.
Toggle view California – 10.75 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
To claim California MCLE credit, California credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE is required to provide the State Bar with electronic attendance records for any MCLE participatory activity within 60 days of completion of the activity. The California licensee is responsible for reporting their compliance/credit hours earned to the State Bar at the end of their reporting period directly to the State Bar of California at calbar.ca.gov.  UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Delaware – 10.80 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
UT Law CLE will report attendance on behalf of the attorney to the Delaware CLE Commission within 30 days of the conference. Please contact us at accreditation@utcle.org with any questions.
Toggle view Florida – 13.00 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
Self-report your CLE credit directly to The Florida Bar at www.floridabar.org. You must claim your credit online in Your Briefcase, and will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.  
Toggle view Illinois – 10.25 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
To claim Illinois MCLE credit, Illinois credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Within 10 days of the conference you must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, then you will be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will verify the number of Illinois attorneys in attendance within 10 days after the conference and will report your credit to the 
MCLE Board of the Supreme Court of Illinois. Failure to submit your credit within 10 days may result in attendance not being reported or may result in additional fees being assessed to you for credit reporting. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years.

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view New Jersey – Available Via Reciprocity – 13.00 hrs  |  1.50 hrs Ethics
To claim New Jersey MCLE credit, New Jersey credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. At the conclusion of the conference you will need to claim and certify your credit online, in your UTCLE "Briefcase". Self-report your CLE credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. UT Law CLE will maintain Attendance Records for four years. Self-report your credit directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on CLE.

As The University of Texas School of Law is a State Bar of Texas approved MCLE provider (Sponsor #13), our courses are presumptively approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Regulations of the Supreme Court of New Jersey Board on Continuing Legal Education. More information and details can be found in the Board of Continuing Legal Education Regulations (PDF).

New Jersey MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

 
Toggle view New York – Available Via Reciprocity – 13.00 hrs  |  1.50 hrs Ethics
To claim New York MCLE credit, New York credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.   

As The University of Texas School of Law is a Oklahoma Bar Association presumptively approved MCLE provider (#169), and Oklahoma is a New York Approved Jurisdiction on List A, our courses are approved for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour, and in accordance with the Program Rules and the Regulations and Guidelines of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board. More information and details can be found at Section 6 of the Regulations and Guidelines (PDF).

Upon claiming and certifying your credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your credit directly to the New York State CLE Board.

New York MCLE credit is based on a 50-minute credit hour. This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
 
Toggle view Ohio – 10.75 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
To claim Ohio MCLE credit, Ohio credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

You must claim and certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to The Supreme Court of Ohio within 30 days after the conference. 

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Oklahoma – 13.00 hrs  |  1.50 hrs Ethics
To claim Oklahoma MCLE credit, Oklahoma credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #169) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Oklahoma Bar Association for MCLE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. UT Law CLE will report credit on your behalf to the Oklahoma Bar Association within 30 days after the webcast.
Toggle view Pennsylvania – 10.50 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
To claim Pennsylvania MCLE credit, Pennsylvania credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. Verification pop-ups will NOT display when the webcast video player is in "full screen" mode. Furthermore, the notification sound effect alerting pop-ups, will NOT play on mobile devices. We recommend viewing from a computer, as opposed to a mobile device, should MCLE credit, other than Texas, be needed. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion. 

UT Law CLE is an approved provider of Pennsylvania credit, sponsor #236. Attorney attendance will be reported to Pennsylvania within 2 weeks after credit is claimed and submitted. Attorneys are not able to report this credit on their own, and UT Law CLE pays all associated fees for the credit hours. Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.

MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Toggle view Virginia – 9.25 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
Virginia MCLE credit has been requested for this program. We will follow up with attendees who select Virginia credit and provide them with a Certificate of Attendance with the course number that can be used to self-report to Virginia. Contact service@utcle.org with any questions.
Toggle view Other States – 10.75 hrs  |  1.00 hrs Ethics
Note on Self-Reporting Your Credits in Another State
If you wish to satisfy MCLE or other professional education requirements in another state for a program offered by the University of Texas School of Law, please check with the state bar or other licensing authority in that state to ensure it will qualify for self-reporting your credits.
 
To claim Other States MCLE credit, Other States credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. You must claim and  certify your credit online in Your Briefcase, you will then be provided a Certificate of Attendance for your records and to provide to other licensing authorities as needed. 

This accreditation requires attendance verification. UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.
MCLE credit is presented based on a 60-minute credit hour.
Other Credit
Toggle view TX Accounting CPE – 13.00 hrs
The University of Texas School of Law (Provider #250) live webcast presentations meet the requirements and are presumptively approved by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy for Texas Accounting CPE credit based on a 50-minute credit hour. Approved for general CPE credit only.

This accreditation requires attendance verification. In compliance with the rules, UT Law CLE monitors and records attendee responses to questions that randomly appear during the live webcast presentation. The response record is detailed on the Certificate of Completion.

To claim Texas Accounting CPE credit, the Texas Accounting CPE credit option must be selected PRIOR to viewing the live webcast. Upon claiming credit, a Certificate of Completion will be emailed to you. Self-report your CPE credit directly to the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy.

Contact us at accreditation@utcle.org if you have additional questions.

Key Dates

Live Webcast – Mar 23-25, 2021
Conference Concluded
Buy
  • Live Webcast
Individual
Last day for $495.00 Regular pricing: Feb 1, 2021

$545.00 for registrations received after this time

USPTO Employee
Last day for $195.00 Regular pricing: Mar 23, 2021

$195.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (5 registrants minimum)
Last day for $490.00 Regular pricing: Mar 23, 2021

$490.00 for registrations received after this time

Group (10 registrants minimum)
Last day for $435.00 Regular pricing: Mar 23, 2021

$435.00 for registrations received after this time

Last day for cancellation (full refund): Mar 17, 2021

$50 processing fee applied after this date

Last day for cancellation: Mar 19, 2021

Our Sponsors

Thank you to our sponsors! Click each logo below to learn more.

  • Chamberlain Hrdlicka logo
    Chamberlain Hrdlicka
    Chamberlain Hrdlicka profile statement
     
    Chamberlain Hrdlicka is a diversified law firm providing value at the highest level of client service. Although we have grown over the past five decades to more than 150 attorneys with a wide variety of practice areas, personalized attention to our clients’ needs remains a hallmark of our heritage. Our tradition of personalized service continues to be valued by clients from the smallest start-up ventures to the largest multinational companies.
     
    Over the years, individuals and business entities alike have placed their trust in Chamberlain Hrdlicka for one simple reason: they know they will be represented by highly-skilled and dedicated attorneys who provide a level of sophistication, client service and a value proposition that is unmatched. 
     
    Chamberlain Hrdlicka
     
      www.chamberlainlaw.com/
  • Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. logo
    Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
    Based in Washington, D.C. and renowned for more than four decades for dedication to the protection, transfer, and enforcement of intellectual property rights, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox is one of the most highly regarded intellectual property specialty law firms in the world. Its team of attorneys, registered patent agents, students, and technical specialists include some of the country's most respected practitioners of IP law tackling innovations across a broad spectrum of industries. The firm’s practitioners hold over 50 masters and over 50 doctorate degrees in science or engineering and represent Fortune 500 companies, entrepreneurs, start-ups, inventors, venture capital firms, and universities in a client service driven environment that is welcoming, inclusive, and intellectually stimulating.  www.sternekessler.com/
Download Sponsor Details Become a Sponsor
Become a Sponsor
Email UT Law CLE for more information on sponsoring an event.

Stay in the loop with UT Law CLE

Sign-Up Now  
Accredited CLE
Live Conferences
Studio Webcasts
eConferences
eCourses
Hooked on CLE
Answer Bar
Research & Self-Study
Materials
eLibrary

Subscriptions
MCLE On-Demand and eLibrary
Your UT Law CLE
Your Briefcase
Your Account
Your Cart
Redeem Your Code
Sign In or Join
About
Scholarships
Sponsorships
Speakers
Texas Law Resources
UT Law CLE
About Us
Our Volunteers
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Security
Help & Contact
FAQ
Contact Us
Facebook    LinkedIn    Youtube

© 2025 The University of Texas School of Law Continuing Legal Education | 512.475.6700 | Version 9.021

Back to top
More Information
Warning
Error
Warning
Please sign in to continue
Forgot Password   |  Create Account
Item has been added to your cart.

Item description

Checkout
Item has been added to your Briefcase.

Item description

Go to your Briefcase