eCourse art

eCourse

Annexation

Contains material from May 2020

Annexation
4.25 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?

well done

Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org



Session 1: Mother May I?: Annexation after HB 347What’s left of annexation other than playing in the MUD? HB 347 dramatically changed the landscape for annexation. The scope of authority to annex without a vote has been severely limited. Address what authority is left for annexation after the adoption of HB 347.

Session 2: Beyond Boundaries: Land Use in the ETJ - How does the drastic reduction of annexation powers change regulation of land use in the ETJ? In the past, cities may have exercised regulatory power in their ETJs with the assumption that those areas would someday be within city limits and used annexation power to bring already developed areas into their city limits. If that is no longer true, should cities continue to exert regulatory power in their ETJ? Examine how this shifts the negotiation of 1445s between cities and counties.  

Includes: Video Audio Paper Slides

  • Total Credit Hours:
  • 1.00
  • Credit Info
  • TX, CA
  • Specialization: Administrative Law | Oil, Gas and Mineral Law | Real Estate Law
  • TX MCLE credit expires: 6/30/2024

Preview mode. You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse, and the eCourse must be active to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Credit

Show session details

1. Mother May I?: Annexation after HB 347  (May 2020)

Charles E. Zech

0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
19 mins
(mp3)
19 mins
(pdf)
27 pgs
(pdf)
7 pgs
Session 1 —19 mins
0.25
Mother May I?: Annexation after HB 347  (May 2020)

What’s left of annexation other than playing in the MUD? HB 347 dramatically changed the landscape for annexation. The scope of authority to annex without a vote has been severely limited. Address what authority is left for annexation after the adoption of HB 347.

Originally presented: Apr 2020 Land Use Conference

Charles E. Zech, Denton, Navarro, Rocha, Bernal & Zech, P.C. - Austin, TX

Show session details

2. Beyond Boundaries: Land Use in the ETJ (May 2020)

Matthew J. Festa, Daniele Skye Masson

0.75 0.00 0.00 0.75
Preview Materials

Download session materials for offline use

(mp4)
45 mins
(mp3)
45 mins
(pdf)
10 pgs
Session 2 —45 mins
0.75
Beyond Boundaries: Land Use in the ETJ (May 2020)

How does the drastic reduction of annexation powers change regulation of land use in the ETJ? In the past, cities may have exercised regulatory power in their ETJs with the assumption that those areas would someday be within city limits and used annexation power to bring already developed areas into their city limits. If that is no longer true, should cities continue to exert regulatory power in their ETJ? Examine how this shifts the negotiation of 1445s between cities and counties.  

Originally presented: Apr 2020 Land Use Conference

Matthew J. Festa, South Texas College of Law Houston - Houston, TX
Daniele Skye Masson, City of Georgetown - Georgetown, TX