UT Law's 28th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute covers the latest developments in patent law and features a sophisticated array of prosecution and litigation topics. Hear from nationally recognized faculty including senior IP counsel of major corporations, patent prosecution and litigation experts from around the nation, U.S. District Court Judges, and leading academics.
- Total Credit Hours:
- 12.00 hrs | 2.25 Ethics
- Credit Info
- TX, CA, PA
- TX MCLE credit expires: 12/31/2024
-
show rating
2023 Advanced Patent Law (Austin) eConference4.47 out of 5 starsWhat was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Good overview of Patent Law. Would like more discussions on patent licensing.
Excellent content as always.
The program should include 3 hours of ethics, or an optional add-on that would bring the total ethics hours to 3.
UT Law's 27th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute covers the latest developments in patent law and features a sophisticated array of prosecution and litigation topics. Hear from nationally recognized faculty including senior IP counsel of major corporations, patent prosecution and litigation experts from around the nation, U.S. District Court Judges, and leading academics.
- Total Credit Hours:
- 14.50 hrs | 3.25 Ethics
- Credit Info
- TX, CA, PA
- TX MCLE credit expires: 11/30/2024
-
show rating
2022 Advanced Patent Law (Austin) eConference4.06 out of 5 starsWhat was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Mostly very good, but I thought the claim construction (first lecture) and damages panel (9th lecture) were kind of hard to follow. The claim construction talk was rushed and often made reference to the accompanying paper, but I often couldn't match the information in the slide being shown to info in the paper. Damages discussion assumed a rather high level of familiarity already, and often threw out case names with no citations.
Very well done and informative