eCourse
Written Description Requirements and Section 112(f)
Contains material from Apr 2021
Written Description Requirements and Section 112(f)
4.5 out of 5 stars
What was the overall quality of the course (presentation, materials, and technical delivery)?
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness and presentation skills of faculty for the course.
How would you rate the value of the materials provided as part of the course?
Technical Questions?
512.475.6700
service@utcle.org
For years, the law involving means-plus-function clauses under Section 112(f) was quiescent and stable. But Examiners have been construing claim elements under Section 112(f) and applying the law of Section 112(f) - BOTH in high tech AND life sciences. Hear discussion on the potential pitfalls and practical solutions for drafting claims and specifications.
Includes: Video Audio Slides
- Total Credit Hours:
- 0.75
- Credit Info
- TX, CA
- TX MCLE credit expires: 5/31/2024
Preview mode.
You must be signed in, have purchased this eCourse,
and the eCourse must be active
to have full access.
Preview Sessions
Credit
Show session details
1.
Written Description Requirements and Section 112(f) (Apr 2021)
Dale S. Lazar, Nicole Woods
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.75
Preview Materials
Download session materials for offline use
Session 1
—48 mins
0.75
Written Description Requirements and Section 112(f) (Apr 2021)
For years, the law involving means-plus-function clauses under Section 112(f) was quiescent and stable. But Examiners have been construing claim elements under Section 112(f) and applying the law of Section 112(f) - BOTH in high tech AND life sciences. Hear discussion on the potential pitfalls and practical solutions for drafting claims and specifications.
Originally presented: Mar 2021 Advanced Patent Law Institute
Dale S. Lazar,
Antonin Scalia Law School George Mason University - Arlington, VA
Nicole Woods,
Eli Lilly and Company - Somerville, NJ